The Trump administration officials are debating the possibility of lifting sanctions on Russia’s Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline and other energy assets as part of peace efforts in Ukraine, Politico reported on April 23, citing five undisclosed sources.

Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, who is set to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow for their fourth meeting on April 25, has reportedly promoted the idea. It has “not found much traction in the White House,” and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has opposed it, Politico reported.

U.S. officials have refuted Politico’s story.

“This is unequivocally false. Neither Steve Witkoff nor I have had any conversations about lifting sanctions against Russia as part of a deal with Ukraine,” Rubio said on X.

The news comes as U.S. President Donald Trump seeks to broker a swift peace deal in Ukraine, warning he might drop the effort unless tangible progress is made soon.

Washington’s latest peace proposal reportedly includes the U.S. de jure recognizing Russian control of Crimea and development of closer economic and energy cooperation with Russia.

Witkoff’s proposal to ease energy sanctions has also been opposed by Interior Secretary Doug Burgun, who leads the White House Energy Dominance Council and wants to boost U.S. liquified natural gas (LNG) sales, Politico reported.

Restarting the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which saw one of its lines damaged during an unexplained explosion in the Baltic Sea in 2022, would also require the EU countries to resume purchases of Russian gas.

The EU set the goal of weaning itself off Russian fossil fuels by 2027 in response to Moscow’s all-out invasion of Ukraine.

Rubio has previously said that the U.S. will maintain its sanctions against Russia until a peace deal is reached, but said relief would likely be part of an eventual settlement. The final agreement would therefore have to include the EU, which has also slapped extensive sanctions on Moscow, he noted.

If Trump recognizes Crimea, the biggest losers are Ukraine — and the US, experts say

Formally recognizing Crimea as Russian would breach international law and potentially open the door to further global conflicts, experts warn.

The Kyiv IndependentNatalia Yermak

Ukraine and the U.S. agreed to start working on a free trade zone between the two countries, Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal said on April 23 after meeting U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Washington.

Ukraine and the U.S. launched initial talks on a free trade zone back in 2021. Earlier, Shmyhal said that Kyiv seeks to boost bilateral trade and an agreement with the U.S. to allow “everything except for the fixed exceptions."

Ukrainian trade with the U.S. has dropped in recent years, with only $874 million of exports and $3.4 billion of American imports last year. But the knock-on effect could be a global trade war that hits Ukraine too, Oleksandra Myronenko from the Center for Economic Strategy (CES) in Kyiv, told the Kyiv Independent.

In early April, U.S. President Donald Trump imposed a 10% tariff on all Ukrainian goods, except metal products, which had already been subject to a 25% tariff in March.

According to Shmyhal, the parties also discussed “important political aspects” of the long-debated future minerals deal between Kyiv and Washington, which was reaffirmed in a recently signed memorandum. Further details on the ongoing negotiations are expected by April 26.

“Ukraine’s government undoubtedly supports the conclusion of an agreement on economic partnership between the American and Ukrainian peoples and the creation of a Reconstruction Investment Fund,” the prime minister said.

Shmyhal also called on the U.S. to strengthen energy sanctions against Russia due to the occupation of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant.

Politico reported on April 23, citing undisclosed sources, that the Trump administration is discussing the possible lifting of sanctions on Russia’s Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline and other Russian energy assets in Europe.

Ukraine has no great options if Trump recognizes Crimea as Russian

Ukraine is facing a crossroads in its fight against Russia’s full-scale invasion, with the possibility of being forced to reject an unfavorable peace deal being imposed under huge pressure from the U.S.

The Kyiv IndependentChris York

President Volodymyr Zelensky said on April 23 that Ukraine will always act in accordance with its Constitution, sharing a 2018 U.S. declaration denouncing Russian occupation of Crimea and reaffirming Ukraine’s territorial integrity.

Though Zelensky did not mention it explicitly, the statement seems to refer to the U.S. reportedly proposing its de jure recognition of Russian control over the southern Ukrainian peninsula, which Russia has occupied since 2014, as part of a potential peace deal.

“Russia, through its 2014 invasion of Ukraine and its attempted annexation of Crimea, sought to undermine a bedrock international principle shared by democratic states: that no country can change the borders of another by force,” Mike Pompeo, the U.S. secretary of state during the first Trump administration, said in the Crimea Declaration in July 2018.

“In concert with allies, partners, and the international community, the United States rejects Russia’s attempted annexation of Crimea and pledges to maintain this policy until Ukraine’s territorial integrity is restored."

U.S. President Donald Trump’s second term saw him adopt a more Russian-friendly policy as he seeks to restore bilateral ties and broker a peace in Ukraine.

Washington’s latest peace proposal reportedly included not only de jure recognition of Crimea’s annexation but also de facto acceptance of Russian occupation of parts of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson oblasts.

Zelensky has previously ruled out formally ceding any territory to Russia, after which U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio skipped London peace talks with Ukrainian and European officials on April 23.

The White House also lashed out against Zelensky’s statements on Crimea, saying that “nobody is asking Zelensky to recognize Crimea as Russian territory."

The London meeting still took place on a technical level, with Ukrainian delegates – Presidential Office head Andriy Yermak, Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha, and Defense Minister Rustem Umerov – stressing the need for a ceasefire as the first necessary step toward a peace deal.

“Emotions have run high today. But it is good that five countries met to bring peace closer. Ukraine, the U.S., the U.K., France, and Germany,” Zelensky said.

“We are grateful to partners. Ukraine will always act in accordance with its Constitution and we are absolutely sure that our partners, in particular the U.S., will act in line with its strong decisions."

Ukraine has no great options if Trump recognizes Crimea as Russian

Ukraine is facing a crossroads in its fight against Russia’s full-scale invasion, with the possibility of being forced to reject an unfavorable peace deal being imposed under huge pressure from the U.S.

The Kyiv IndependentChris York

Editor’s note: The story is being updated.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in South Africa to meet his South African counterpart, Cyril Ramaphosa, and other representatives of African countries, Zelensky said on April 24.

“It is crucial to bring a just peace closer. We are working to ensure that the G20 countries are actively engaged in diplomatic efforts,” Zelensky said.

“We count on South Africa’s meaningful participation in the International Coalition for the return of thousands of Ukrainian children abducted by Russia. We will also certainly strengthen our cultural and educational ties."

South Africa, the continent’s largest economy that currently chairs the G20 group, has maintained a neutral stance in the war while deepening its economic and political ties with Moscow.

The country is a member of the BRICS group alongside Russia and China and conducted joint naval drills with both nations while resisting Western calls to distance itself from the Kremlin.

Russia has lost 945,330 troops in Ukraine since the beginning of its full-scale invasion on Feb. 24, 2022, the General Staff of Ukraine’s Armed Forces reported on April 24.

The number includes 1,060 casualties Russian forces suffered just over the past day.

According to the report, Russia has also lost 10,694 tanks, 22,312 armored fighting vehicles, 45,755 vehicles and fuel tanks, 26,823 artillery systems, 1,369 multiple launch rocket systems, 1,141 air defense systems, 370 airplanes, 335 helicopters, 33,660 drones, 28 ships and boats, and one submarine.

‘Russian peace in all its glory’ — Mass Russian missile, drone attack on Kyiv kills 9, injures over 70

Nine people have been killed and another 63 injured, including six children, in Russia’s large-scale missile and drone attack on Kyiv overnight on April 24, Ukrainian officials said.

The Kyiv IndependentVolodymyr Ivanyshyn

When pressed by reporters on April 23, U.S. President Donald Trump declined to weigh in on whether he wants Ukraine to recognize occupied Crimea as Russian territory, calling instead for the end to hostilities.

“I just want to see the war end, I don’t care,” Trump told reporters. “If they’re both happy, they both sign an agreement, I have no favorites. I don’t want to have any favorites. I want to have a deal done."

Earlier in the day, Trump claimed in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, that the U.S. is not forcing Ukraine to recognize Crimea as Russian, following reports that a U.S. peace plan includes the U.S. formally recognizing Moscow’s illegal annexation of Crimea.

“Nobody is asking (President Volodymyr) Zelensky to recognize Crimea as Russian Territory, but if he wants Crimea, why didn’t they fight for it eleven years ago when it was handed over to Russia without a shot being fired?” Trump wrote on April 23.

Zelensky reaffirmed on April 22 that Ukraine would never legally recognize Russia’s control of Crimea.

“There is nothing to talk about. This violates our Constitution. This is our territory, the territory of the people of Ukraine,” Zelensky said at a briefing in Kyiv.

“Ukraine will always act in accordance with its Constitution, and we are fully confident that our partners — particularly the United States — will act in line with their strong decisions,” another statement from Zelensky on April 23 stated.

While Trump appeared to frame the proposal as something Ukraine could reject, he notably did not deny that the U.S. might move forward with formally recognizing Crimea as Russian territory, something Russia had wanted for years.

Recognition of the annexation would contradict a decade of bipartisan U.S. policy and a 2014 United Nations General Assembly resolution, in which 100 member states declared the seizure illegal.

Trump’s claim that Crimea was taken without force is false. During Russia’s 2014 annexation, armed Russian troops in unmarked uniforms seized Ukrainian government buildings, military installations, and blockaded bases.

Trump says ‘nobody is asking’ Ukraine to recognize Crimea as Russian

“Nobody is asking (President Volodymyr) Zelensky to recognize Crimea as Russian Territory, but if he wants Crimea, why didn’t they fight for it eleven years ago when it was handed over to Russia without a shot being fired?” U.S. President Donald Trump wrote.

The Kyiv IndependentTim Zadorozhnyy

U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters on April 23 that he may meet Russian President Vladimir Putin “shortly” following his trip to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates in May.

When asked by reporters whether Trump would meet with Putin in Saudi Arabia during his visit to the Middle East between May 13-16, Trump responded: “It’s possible, but most likely not."

“I think we’ll meet with him shortly thereafter,” Trump added, without providing a specific timeline.

Despite ongoing ceasefire negotiations, Trump and Putin have yet to have direct contact, communicating only through their officials. Trump’s last in-person encounter with his Russian counterpart was during the 2018 Helsinki Summit during the U.S. president’s first term.

Trump’s advisers have been insistent a conversation with Putin should take place only after Russia agrees to a ceasefire in Ukraine. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is again expected to meet Putin in Moscow on April 25.

Earlier in the day on April 23, Trump said that believes a deal between Russia and Ukraine to end Russia’s war has been reached.

“I think we have a deal with both, I hope they do it,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

Trump has repeatedly proposed brokering a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia with concessions Kyiv has not put on the table. The U.S. is reportedly weighing recognizing Russian control of Crimea.

Ukraine has already agreed to a U.S.-proposed full 30-day ceasefire, saying on March 11 that Kyiv is ready if Russia also agrees to the terms. So far, Moscow has refused.

On April 23, Zelensky reaffirmed that Ukraine insists on an “immediate, full, and unconditional ceasefire."

Kremlin spokesperson reiterates demands for Ukraine to give up territory in exchange for end to war

In an interview with French outlet Le Point, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov laid out Moscow’s demands for a ceasefire in Ukraine, including the full recognition of Russia’s claim over four Ukrainian oblasts it partially occupies, neutral status for Ukraine, and an end to all Western military support.

The Kyiv IndependentAnna Fratsyvir

In a bold and strategic move, Ukraine has reportedly launched an aerial assault on a Russian plant known for producing "Shahed" drones, with five 250-kg bombs hitting the site in Tatarstan. Situated 1,700 kilometers from the Ukrainian border, the city of Yelabuga in the Republic of Tatarstan was the focus of this alleged drone attack, believed to originate from Ukraine. The target was a factory located in the Alabuga Special Economic Zone, which, according to Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council's Center for Counteracting Disinformation, produced more than 6,000 Shahed kamikaze drones and numerous decoy drones in 2024, with plans to ramp up production to 10,000 units by 2025.

Russian reports indicate that four drones were shot down over Yelabuga, yet Telegram channel SHOT mentions six drones involved, with only one intercepted and five hitting the site. Videos from local residents captured drone flights and air defense operations. "Nikolaevsky Vanek" reports that all six drones were carrying hefty 250-kg aerial bombs each. As a result, temporary restrictions were implemented at airports in Nizhnekamsk and Kazan, leading to flight suspensions. 

The General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces has confirmed a successful strike on a Russian drone manufacturing plant more than 1000 km from Ukraine.  According to Ukrainian military, the strike resulted in confirmed damage to the final assembly workshop, although the overall impact of the attack remains under assessment.

The General Staff has labeled this strike as a justified response to the Russian strategic military facility, used for supporting Russia's attacks against civilians. 

The successful strike signifies the capabilities of Ukrainian drones to hit targets deep within Russian territory, extending as far as 1,700 kilometers from the border, thus highlighting the vulnerability of strategic assets situated deep within Russia. This is not the first time this key site has been targeted; on April 2, 2024, the same Yelabuga plant was attacked by drones leading to damage to buildings and injuries among students at Alabuga Polytech College.

Ukraine has expressed willingness to engage in negotiations with Russia yet steadfastly emphasizes that capitulation is out of the question. Economy Minister Yulia Svyrydenko remarked that the Ukrainians will not entertain the notion of a frozen conflict, nor will they concede to the recognition of Crimea's occupation.

During discussions in London, the Ukrainian delegation declared the impossibility of acknowledging Crimea as Russian—now or in the future. Svyrydenko delivered this statement with marked decisiveness through her post, underscoring Kyiv's unwavering stance: "Ukraine is ready to negotiate, but not to surrender."

Svyrydenko further asserted that no agreement would allow Russia time to regroup and potentially launch renewed violence. Ukraine demands a complete ceasefire across all fronts—land, air, and sea—as the essential initial measure. Should Moscow opt for merely a "tactical pause," Ukraine will respond in kind.

The minister also underlined that if NATO membership is not forthcoming, Ukraine will seek robust and explicit security assurances from partners—assurances that are sufficiently potent to deter aggression and clear enough to ensure lasting peace.

As The Washington Post reports, the U.S. administration has expressed disappointment in Kyiv's resolve to not barter territory for the sake of apparent progress.  In Washington, there is particular dissatisfaction with Ukraine's emphasis on ceasefire discussions over making concessions on Crimea.

Following Ukraine's firm stance, Senator Rubio canceled his trip to London, prompting the foreign ministers of the UK and France to follow suit. Negotiations now persist on a technical level with advisor Kellogg.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, according to reports from The New York Times and CNN, has categorically refused to acknowledge Crimea as Russian.

Sky News reports that after Rubio’s withdrawal, meetings with UK Foreign Minister David Lammy, French Foreign Minister Stéphane Barraux, and other senior officials were also called off. Consequently, negotiations have effectively been reduced to a technical level.

Although European officials remain skeptical about the success of the London talks, as Reuters reports, an EU diplomat indicated that Rubio's withdrawal was prompted by concerns over Kyiv's "hardline" approach, which supposedly hinders progress.

European diplomats, as reported by Reuters and The Washington Post, initially held low expectations for the success of the London talks, describing the chances of an outcome as minimal.

While the U.S. has not officially demanded that Ukraine recognize Crimea, observers believe this issue has fueled the strong reactions from Kyiv and Europe.

Moscow insists that Europe lift sanctions. However, the EU insists this can occur only post-negotiations. Additionally, the Kremlin is dissatisfied with the lack of American pressure on Kyiv regarding demilitarization and staunchly opposes the deployment of European troops in Ukraine.

Reminding all that during the March 12 talks in Jeddah, it was agreed that a ceasefire should precede territorial discussions, Ukraine and Europe emphasize that U.S. actions now appear contradictory, pressuring Kyiv rather than demanding Moscow take steps.

Ukraine's perspective suggests it's not only about the U.S.'s shifting stance but also the loss of Washington’s integrity as an impartial broker, now seemingly preparing to withdraw from the negotiation process while blaming Ukraine. In such a scenario, Kyiv might retain European support but lose the pivotal backing of Washington.

U.S. President Donald Trump said on April 23 he believes a deal between Russia and Ukraine to end Russia’s war has been reached.

“I think we have a deal with both, I hope they do it,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

Trump has repeatedly proposed brokering a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia with concessions Kyiv has not put on the table. The U.S. is reportedly weighing recognizing Russian control of Crimea.

Trump noted President Volodymyr Zelensky has been “harder” to deal with, but that “it’s all right."

“I thought it might be easier to deal with Zelensky. So far it’s been harder,” Trump claimed.

Trump said the U.S. has reached a deal with Russia and must reach a deal with Ukraine, despite in the same address claiming he thinks the U.S. has a “deal with both."

“I think we have a deal with Russia. We have to get a deal with Zelensky,” Trump said.

Earlier on April 23, U.S. Vice President JD Vance said that the U.S. presented a “very explicit proposal” to Ukraine and Russia on a peace deal.

Vance repeated warnings that the U.S. might drop its peace efforts if both sides refuse to settle a peace deal. White House officials have warned that Washington would abandon the peace efforts if a deal is not reached soon.

Moscow has shown signs it is unwilling to move forward on a peace deal with Ukraine. Russian authorities have listed maximalist demands in ceasefire negotiations with Ukraine and the U.S.

Ukraine has already agreed to a U.S.-proposed full 30-day ceasefire, saying on March 11 that Kyiv is ready if Russia also agrees to the terms. So far, Moscow has refused.

On April 23, Zelensky reaffirmed that Ukraine insists on an “immediate, full, and unconditional ceasefire."

“That was the proposal put forward by the United States on March 11 of this year — and it was absolutely reasonable,” Zelensky said.

Ukraine war latest: US expects territorial concessions from Russia, Ukraine in potential peace deal

Key developments on April 23: * US expects territorial concessions from Russia, Ukraine in potential peace deal * Ukraine insists on unconditional ceasefire at London peace talks * Trump says ‘nobody is asking’ Ukraine to recognize Crimea as Russian * ‘Groundless accusations, political manipulations’ — China reacts to Ukraine summoning its envoy * Ukrainian drone strike

The Kyiv IndependentThe Kyiv Independent news desk

Editor’s Note: This is a developing story and is being updated.

A round of explosions occurred in Kyiv around 1:00 a.m. local time on April 24, according to a Kyiv Independent journalist on the ground.

Air defenses are in operation, Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said in a post to Telegram.

Fallen debris has been found, Kyiv’s military head Tymur Tkachenko reported.

Russia has regularly targeted civilian infrastructure since the onset of its full-scale war against Ukraine in February 2022.

The U.S. has been in talks with Ukraine and Russia to negotiate an end to Russia’s war against Ukraine.

Ukraine has already agreed to a U.S.-proposed full 30-day ceasefire, saying on March 11 that Kyiv is ready if Russia also agrees to the terms. So far, Moscow has refused.

If Trump recognizes Crimea, the biggest losers are Ukraine — and the US, experts say

Formally recognizing Crimea as Russian would breach international law and potentially open the door to further global conflicts, experts warn.

The Kyiv IndependentNatalia Yermak

U.S. Special Envoy Keith Kellogg called for a peace deal to end Russia’s war against Ukraine on April 23, following his participation in a London meeting on Ukraine.

“It’s time to move forward on (U.S.) President (Donald) Trump’s (Ukraine-Russia) war directive: stop the killing, achieve peace, and put America First,” Kellogg said in a post to social media.

The London meeting comes as the U.S. intensifies efforts to broker a deal between Ukraine and Russia, following failed efforts to reach a ceasefire. White House officials have repeatedly warned that Washington would abandon the peace efforts if a deal is not reached soon.

Kellogg noted the talks in London with Presidential Office head Andriy Yermak were “positive."

The meeting was originally meant to be a ministerial-level summit involving the U.S., U.K., Germany, France, and Ukraine. The gathering was notably downgraded when U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff declined to participate.

Earlier on April 23, U.S. Vice President JD Vance said that the U.S. presented a “very explicit proposal” to Ukraine and Russia on a peace deal.

Vance repeated warnings that the U.S. might drop its peace efforts if both sides refuse to settle a peace deal.

The U.S. is reportedly considering recognizing Moscow’s illegal occupation of Crimea as part of a peace deal, despite Russia’s annexation violating international law.

Zelensky has said Ukraine will not legally recognize Crimea as Russian territory.

Moscow has shown signs it is unwilling to move forward on a peace deal with Ukraine. Russian authorities have listed maximalist demands in ceasefire negotiations with Ukraine and the U.S.

Ukraine has already agreed to a U.S.-proposed full 30-day ceasefire, saying on March 11 that Kyiv is ready if Russia also agrees to the terms. So far, Moscow has refused.

Ukraine has no great options if Trump recognizes Crimea as Russian

Ukraine is facing a crossroads in its fight against Russia’s full-scale invasion, with the possibility of being forced to reject an unfavorable peace deal being imposed under huge pressure from the U.S.

The Kyiv IndependentChris York

The mechanized brigade is slated to receive a new—and finally official—insignia.

Source

President Volodymyr Zelensky is “moving in the wrong direction” in peace talks to bring an end to Russia’s war against Ukraine, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on April 23.

"(U)nfortunately, President Zelensky seems to be moving in the wrong direction," Leavitt said to reporters outside the White House.

Earlier in the day, U.S. President Donald Trump claimed, “Nobody is asking Zelensky to recognize Crimea as Russian territory, but if he wants Crimea, why didn’t (Ukraine) fight for it eleven years ago,” amid reports that the U.S. could recognize Crimea as Russian in a potential peace deal.

Leavitt repeated Trump’s earlier remarks, noting Ukraine would not be asked to recognize Crimea as Russian.

“Well as President Trump rightfully pointed out in that statement, it was (former U.S.) President (Barack) Obama, who gave up Crimea, who allowed Russia to take it over in 2014, and so the president is not asking Ukraine to recognize Crimea, nobody has asked them to do that,” she said.

The press secretary noted that Trump wants Ukraine and Russia to both make concessions and bring an end to Russia’s war against Ukraine.

“What he is asking is for people to come to the negotiating table recognizing that this has been a brutal war for far too long, and in order to make a good deal, both sides have to walk away a little bit unhappy,” Leavitt said.

Leavitt slammed Zelensky for speaking to the media, claiming that the negotiations should be private.

Zelensky has said Ukraine will not legally recognize Crimea as Russian territory, as the U.S. weighs recognizing Moscow’s illegal occupation despite Russia’s annexation violating international law.

"(U)nfortunately President Zelensky has been trying to litigate this peace negotiation in the press and that’s unacceptable to (Trump), these should be closed door negotiations, the president’s national security team, his adviserss have exuded significant time energy and effort to try to bring this war to an end," Leavitt said.

Earlier on April 23, U.S. Vice President JD Vance said that the U.S. presented a “very explicit proposal” to Ukraine and Russia on a peace deal. Vance repeated warnings that the U.S. might drop its peace efforts if both sides refuse.

Ukraine war latest: US expects territorial concessions from Russia, Ukraine in potential peace deal

Key developments on April 23: * US expects territorial concessions from Russia, Ukraine in potential peace deal * Ukraine insists on unconditional ceasefire at London peace talks * Trump says ‘nobody is asking’ Ukraine to recognize Crimea as Russian * ‘Groundless accusations, political manipulations’ — China reacts to Ukraine summoning its envoy * Ukrainian drone strike

The Kyiv IndependentThe Kyiv Independent news desk

Key developments on April 23:

• US expects territorial concessions from Russia, Ukraine in potential peace deal
• Ukraine insists on unconditional ceasefire at London peace talks
• Trump says ‘nobody is asking’ Ukraine to recognize Crimea as Russian
• ‘Groundless accusations, political manipulations’ — China reacts to Ukraine summoning its envoy
• Ukrainian drone strike hits Russian drone factory over 1,000 kilometers from border, military claims

U.S. Vice President JD Vance said on April 23 that the U.S. presented a “very explicit proposal” to Russia and Ukraine on a peace deal, repeating warnings Washington might drop its peace effort if the belligerent sides refuse.

Talking to journalists during a visit to India, Vance said that it is time for Kyiv and Moscow “to either say yes or for the United States to walk away from this process."

“We have engaged in an extraordinary amount of diplomacy and on-the-ground work. We really tried to understand things from the perspectives of both Ukrainians and Russians,” he said. “I think that we put together a very fair proposal."

Vance added that “it’s now time to take, if not the final step, one of the final steps”— with all parties agreeing to stop the fighting, freeze territorial lines “at some level close to where they are,” and pursue a long-term diplomatic settlement.

The U.S. vice president also said that the two sides would have to give up some of the territory they control. Vance noted that eventual borders may not exactly follow the current front line but stressed it is currently necessary to lay down arms and “freeze” the war.

Following Vance’s remarks, a spokesperson for Downing Street told AFP on April 23: “We support U.S.-led efforts to bring about a lasting end to the war. I think that is what we all want. Ultimately, it must be for Ukraine to decide its future."

The comments follow reporting that the U.S. is ready to recognize Russia’s de jure control over Crimea and de facto control over occupied territories in the Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson oblasts as part of a peace deal.

Moscow occupies roughly 20% of Ukraine’s sovereign territory. This includes Crimea and parts of the Donbas region occupied in 2014, and additional territories taken after the start of the full-scale war in 2022.

President Volodymyr Zelensky has rejected the possibility of recognizing Russian hold over Crimea.

U.S. President Donald Trump has said his country will abandon the ceasefire effort in the coming days unless progress is made.

Earlier, a source close to French President Emmanuel Macron told AFP that “respect for Ukraine’s territorial integrity and its European aspirations are very strong demands of the Europeans."

The source added that while French, British, and German officials were meeting with American and Ukrainian envoys in London for ceasefire talks, “the objective remains to build a common approach that the United States could present to the Russians."

Trump’s reported ‘final’ peace plan includes accepting Russian occupation, few benefits for Ukraine

The U.S. reportedly presented its peace proposal last week during a meeting with Ukrainian officials in Paris.

The Kyiv IndependentKateryna Hodunova

Ukraine insists on unconditional ceasefire at London peace talks

A Ukrainian delegation met with European officials and U.S. Special Envoy Keith Kellogg in London on April 23 to continue discussions on a possible path to peace, Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said in a statement on X.

“During our meeting with U.S. Special Envoy General Keith Kellogg, we had a constructive exchange of views on the path to peace,” Sybiha wrote. “Ukraine wants the war to end more than anyone else in the world. We are committed to working together to achieve this goal."

The London meeting, originally intended as a ministerial-level summit involving the U.S., U.K., Germany, France, and Ukraine, was notably downgraded after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff declined to participate.

According to Reuters, Rubio pulled out after Ukraine submitted a document to European partners on April 22 declaring it would not enter talks on territorial issues until Russia agrees to a “full and unconditional ceasefire."

Following the meetings in London, Ukrainian Presidential Office head Andriy Yermak reiterated Kyiv’s position, saying, “An immediate, complete and unconditional ceasefire should be the first step towards the start of negotiations on achieving a just and lasting peace."

Yermak also emphasized that Ukraine would defend its “principled positions,” which form the basis of its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Despite the absence of Rubio and Witkoff, the U.K. Foreign Ministry said “significant progress was made on reaching a common position,” and that all parties reaffirmed support for U.S. President Donald Trump’s stated commitment to achieving a just and lasting peace.

The meeting followed a summit in Paris on April 17, where senior Trump administration officials outlined a controversial peace proposal to Ukrainian and European delegates.

The plan reportedly includes recognition of Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea and a ban on Ukraine’s NATO membership — two central demands by the Kremlin.

Ukraine has no great options if Trump recognizes Crimea as Russian

Ukraine is facing a crossroads in its fight against Russia’s full-scale invasion, with the possibility of being forced to reject an unfavorable peace deal being imposed under huge pressure from the U.S.

The Kyiv IndependentChris York

Trump says ‘nobody is asking’ Ukraine to recognize Crimea as Russian

President Donald Trump claimed in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, that the U.S. is not forcing Ukraine to recognize Crimea as Russian, following reports that a U.S. peace plan includes the U.S. formally recognizing Moscow’s illegal annexation of Crimea.

“Nobody is asking (President Volodymyr) Zelensky to recognize Crimea as Russian Territory, but if he wants Crimea, why didn’t they fight for it eleven years ago when it was handed over to Russia without a shot being fired?” Trump wrote on April 23.

Trump’s remarks come one day after President Volodymyr Zelensky reaffirmed that Ukraine would never legally recognize Russia’s control of Crimea.

“There is nothing to talk about. This violates our Constitution. This is our territory, the territory of the people of Ukraine,” Zelensky said at a briefing in Kyiv on April 22.

In response, Trump called Zelensky’s position “harmful to the peace negotiations with Russia,” claiming that Crimea “was lost years ago under the auspices of President Barack Hussein Obama, and is not even a point of discussion."

The claim that Crimea was taken without force is false. During Russia’s 2014 annexation, armed Russian troops in unmarked uniforms seized Ukrainian government buildings, military installations, and blockaded bases.

At least one Ukrainian serviceman was killed, and dozens were detained or assaulted. The operation, widely condemned by the international community, violated international law.

Trump also argued that “even before the annexation of Crimea, major Russian submarine bases” were present there, and accused Zelensky of inflaming tensions with rhetoric that complicates peace efforts.

“He can have peace, or he can fight for another three years before losing the whole country,” Trump wrote. “I have nothing to do with Russia, but have much to do with wanting to save, on average, five thousand Russian and Ukrainian soldiers a week, who are dying for no reason whatsoever."

Despite expressing frustration over Russia’s refusal to de-escalate the war, the U.S. president has so far avoided imposing any major sanctions or taking punitive action against Moscow for its invasion.

While Trump appeared to frame the proposal as something Ukraine could reject, he notably did not deny that the U.S. might move forward with formally recognizing Crimea as Russian territory, something Russia had wanted for years.

Recognition of the annexation would contradict a decade of bipartisan U.S. policy and a 2014 United Nations General Assembly resolution, in which 100 member states declared the seizure illegal.

On April 22, Refat Chubarov, chairman of the Mejlis, the representative body of the indigenous Crimean Tatar people, firmly rejected any international recognition of Crimea as Russian territory.

“Crimea is the homeland of the indigenous Crimean Tatar people and an integral part of Ukraine,” Chubarov wrote. “Accordingly, no one can decide the fate of Crimea under any circumstances, except for the Ukrainian state and the Crimean Tatar people."

Since 2014, Moscow has used intimidation, religious profiling, and politically motivated terrorism charges to suppress dissent among Crimean Tatars. The Mejlis' stance, Chubarov said, is grounded in international law and fully aligned with the Ukrainian Constitution.

If Trump recognizes Crimea, the biggest losers are Ukraine — and the US, experts say

Formally recognizing Crimea as Russian would breach international law and potentially open the door to further global conflicts, experts warn.

The Kyiv IndependentNatalia Yermak

‘Groundless accusations, political manipulations’ — China reacts to Ukraine summoning its envoy

China’s Foreign Ministry on April 23 accused Ukraine of making “groundless” accusations after the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry summoned a Chinese ambassador to present evidence of Chinese involvement in Russia’s war.

A day earlier, Chinese Ambassador to Ukraine Ma Shengkun was invited to the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry to meet with Deputy Foreign Minister Yevhen Perebyinis.

Perebyinis presented the Chinese ambassador with evidence of Chinese citizens' participation in hostilities against Ukraine on Russia’s side and the involvement of Chinese companies in the production of military products in Russia.

The evidence was also passed on to the Chinese side by the Ukrainian security services.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry called Ukraine’s recent statements “groundless” and “political manipulations."

“We have clarified China’s position on the relevant issues. China strongly opposes groundless accusations and political manipulations,” Guo Jiakun, a spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said during a press briefing.

President Volodymyr Zelensky said on April 17 that China is supplying weapons to Russia, marking Kyiv’s first confirmation that Beijing supports Russia’s war effort by direct military aid. Iran and North Korea are two other allies of Moscow that supply Russia with arms.

Though Beijing has long denied supplying arms, multiple reports have suggested otherwise. In summer 2024, Zelensky said China had assured Ukraine it would not deliver weapons to Russia.

While officially claiming neutrality, Beijing has deepened economic ties with Moscow, supported Russia against Western sanctions, and emerged as a top supplier of dual-use goods that feed the Russian defense sector.

Earlier this month, Ukrainian forces captured two Chinese nationals fighting for Russia in Donetsk Oblast. Zelensky later said that “several hundred” Chinese nationals were fighting on Russia’s side.

China has denied any direct involvement in the war and claimed it has urged its citizens to avoid armed conflicts.

US envoy Witkoff to meet Putin in Moscow on April 25, media reports

The visit comes as the Trump administration intensifies efforts to broker a ceasefire in Russia’s war against Ukraine. Washington has warned it may withdraw from the mediation process if no progress is made in the coming days.

The Kyiv IndependentTim Zadorozhnyy

Ukrainian drone strike hits Russian drone factory over 1,000 kilometers from border, military claims

Ukraine’s military said on April 23 that it struck a Russian facility producing combat drones located more than 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) from Ukraine’s border.

Independent news channel Astra reported earlier in the day that a Ukrainian long-range drone strike had targeted Alabuga, sharing purported footage of a drone being shot down.

The Russian Defense Ministry claimed that Russian air defenses shot down one Ukrainian airplane-type drone in Tatarstan at about 12:20 p.m. local time, without providing further details or mentioning Alabuga.

The strike, carried out by Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces in coordination with other branches of the military, targeted a plant in the Alabuga Special Economic Zone of Russia’s Republic of Tatarstan, the General Staff said.

The facility that was hit manufactures up to 300 Iranian-style Shahed drones and their Russian-made variants, Gerans, per day, according to the General Staff. Shahed-style drones are frequently used by Russia in attacks on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure.

The attack is among Ukraine’s deepest strikes into Russian territory since the full-scale invasion began in 2022. Ukraine hit targets over 1,000 kilometers last year for the first time, with one attack occurring 1,800 kilometers (1,118 miles) from the border in Russia’s Murmansk Oblast.

The General Staff said that there were “confirmed hits and explosions in the target area,” and that the damage to the facility as a result of the attack was still being assessed.

“The strike is a justified response against a strategic military site used to support Russia’s aggression and terror against Ukraine and Ukrainian civilians,” the General Staff statement read.

Over 6,000 Shahed-type drones were produced in Alabuga last year, as well as thousands of decoy drones used to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses, said Andrii Kovalenko, an official at Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council.

Russian forces launch hundreds of drones nearly every night at Ukraine, targeting civilian areas and critical infrastructure. The attacks have intensified in recent months as Moscow continues to reject a U.S.-backed proposal for a 30-day ceasefire, which Kyiv says must include a halt to attacks on civilian infrastructure.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has urged a temporary freeze on long-range drone and missile strikes, but Kremlin officials have dismissed the idea.

Note from the author:

Ukraine War Latest is put together by the Kyiv Independent news desk team, who keep you informed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you value our work and want to ensure we have the resources to continue, join the Kyiv Independent community.

The U.S. is reportedly considering officially recognizing Russian control over occupied Crimea as part of a potential peace agreement — a territorial concession that would kill the existing world order and is deemed unacceptable by Ukraine.

According to Axios, the Trump administration’s final proposal for ending Russia’s all-out war against Ukraine included U.S. de jure recognition of Moscow’s control over Crimea, along with de facto recognition of its partial occupation of other Ukrainian regions — Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia.

U.S. President Donald Trump said on April 23 that Washington is not forcing Ukraine to recognize Crimea as Russian. He then followed by accusing Ukraine of not fighting for the peninsula Russia occupies.

“Nobody is asking (President Volodymyr) Zelensky to recognize Crimea as Russian territory, but if he wants Crimea, why didn’t they fight for it 11 years ago when it was handed over to Russia without a shot being fired?” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Russia’s war against Ukraine began in Crimea in 2014. Since then, Moscow has been actively reshaping the peninsula’s ethnic composition, bringing nearly a million Russians into the occupied area and forcing Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars, indigenous people of the peninsula, out and persecuting those who stayed.

The peninsula was turned into a military base, and in 2022, Russia used occupied Crimea as a staging ground for its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The possible U.S. recognition of Russian control over the occupied peninsula would mark an unprecedented step, effectively allowing Moscow to avoid accountability and signal that borders are to be redrawn by force.

For many Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars it would mean, in turn, that they would never be able to return home.

The Kyiv Independent asked Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars to share their stories about Crimea and what would it mean for them if the U.S. would acknowledge and support Russia’s annexation of their homeland.

Alim Aliev, 36, Ukrainian human rights activist, journalist, founder of the Crimean Fig project

For me, Crimea is not just a territory. It is not the sea, mountains, beautiful landscapes, or delicious food. Above all, Crimea is my home. And I haven’t been home for 11 years. My entire childhood was spent in Crimea — my earliest memories, my first victories, my first defeats — all of it happened there. Crimea is what shaped me.

This won’t change much for me personally. Because for me, Crimea remains clearly under occupation, where my people — Crimean Tatars and Ukrainian activists — are constantly and systematically repressed. And it’s a place I simply cannot return to right now. People like me are labeled as ‘extremists,’ ‘terrorists,’ and so on.

That’s why, over the past 11 years, there has been and still is continuous resistance on the peninsula. But beyond that, many Crimean residents, Crimean Tatars, are serving in various units of Ukraine’s Armed Forces, united by a single goal — to return home.

If Trump recognizes Crimea, the biggest losers are Ukraine — and the US, experts say

Formally recognizing Crimea as Russian would breach international law and potentially open the door to further global conflicts, experts warn.

The Kyiv IndependentNatalia Yermak

Crimean Tatar artist, 32, whose family remains on the peninsula

(Anonymous for security reasons)

Recognizing the occupation as legitimate is a turning point.

A precedent where force overshadows law. It is a tacit agreement that you can just come and take what is not yours.

A world in which the door opens for those who redraw borders by force, and borders become temporary agreements. Where silence is interpreted as agreement.

This is not just about Crimea. This is about everyone. Legitimizing the seizure is legalizing lawlessness. And from this moment on, chaos is no longer an anomaly — it is the norm.

A resident based in occupied Crimea, 38

(Anonymous for security reasons)

I regard all his (Trump’s) statements as empty chatter now. He plays on the news and loud statements, that’s all, so I don’t take any such news seriously at all.

Lia Gazı, 23, Crimean Tatar activist in exile

I was born in Crimea, and only now do I truly understand what a privilege that was. Generations of my family fought for the right to live on their native land, enduring exile, surviving the harsh return from Uzbekistan (following the Soviet deportation of Crimean Tatars from Crimea), and rebuilding their lives from scratch… all so that I could be born in Crimea.

I spent the happiest years of my childhood there. That precious time came to an abrupt end with the Russian occupation. For us, Crimea is not just a seaside or a vacation spot. It is our homeland, the one place where we truly belong, where every hill, every street, every scent holds a memory.

One of my warmest memories is of the days when our relatives from Uzbekistan came to visit their homeland. We used to travel often, and only now do I realize that I may never again see the Khan’s Palace in Bakhchisarai the way I remember it from my childhood, because Russia is destroying it. One of the most important symbols of Crimean Tatar history is being erased before our eyes.

As a Crimean Tatar, as someone whose homeland is Crimea, whose ancestors lived and died on that land, the very thought of the U.S. recognizing Russia’s occupation is devastating. I am the fifth generation of my family that has not been able to live freely in Crimea. To me, such recognition would feel like a personal betrayal. It would mean that the hope I’ve carried in my heart all these years, the hope of returning home, is slowly being extinguished.

I have lived in exile believing that one day, justice would prevail and Crimea would be free again. But now, the idea that powerful nations are even considering legitimizing this occupation fills me with profound disappointment, sorrow, and a sense of abandonment.

From the very beginning, the international response to the occupation of Crimea has been too weak. But never did I imagine that we would reach a point where the discussion would shift from how to liberate Crimea to how to normalize its annexation.

For Crimean Tatars, this would be more than just a political decision, it would be a death sentence for our national identity. It would signal to the world that the disappearance of our people, our language, our culture, and our history is acceptable.

The world’s acceptance of Russia’s control over Crimea would mean accepting that the Crimean Tatars, the indigenous people of the peninsula, may cease to exist as a distinct nation.

Kyiv-based student, 21, whose family remains on the peninsula

(Anonymous for security reasons)

“Crimea was the place where my brother and I spent our childhood. We lived there from time to time and, received treatment, and then returned to the mainland. The memories are warm: figs in our own garden, Karaite family friends, hikes in the mountains to the old Krymchak cemeteries. Throughout our childhood, we were prepared for the idea that we would study and live there, and in 2013, we planned to move there permanently.

The legitimization of Russia’s occupation by the U.S. is perceived in the same way as much of what we are hearing from Trump and his team: quite absurd but also scary because it could be done. If the United States decides to take such a step, other countries that are politically and economically dependent on it may follow.

There are indeed pro-Ukrainian residents in Crimea who believe that Ukraine will return.

Tamila Tasheva, 39, Ukrainian lawmaker, president’s former permanent representative for Crimea

Crimea is not just geography, it is not just a territory. It is the place where my family comes from, the place that holds the history of my people. It is the place where my identity was shaped and where my civic activism began. Because of the 1944 deportation, I was born in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, but Crimea has always remained in my heart as a point of return and deep connection.

My personal memories of Crimea include warm evenings there and stories of the 1944 deportation experienced by my loved ones. It also includes the first public demonstrations in support of Crimeans and Ukraine in Crimea, as well as the first impactful civic initiatives.

Since the occupation of Crimea, I have not been able to return home for over 11 years. Sadly, I am not alone. Many Ukrainian citizens, activists, and representatives of the Crimean Tatar people are, for various reasons, barred from returning home. Yet, despite this, Crimea remains a point of internal connection, hope, and resistance.

The idea of possible U.S. recognition of Russia’s occupation of Crimea is absolutely unacceptable. Legally, it contradicts Ukraine’s Constitution, which clearly defines Crimea as part of our sovereign territory. Politically, it would mean surrendering to evil and legitimizing the results of illegal, unprovoked aggression. And personally, it would be yet another attempt to erase my identity, my family’s history, and the struggle of thousands who have fought — and continue to fight — for a free Crimea.

For Crimeans, such a stance is not just a betrayal. It signals that their pain, repression, deportations, arrests, and humiliation supposedly do not matter. It would imply that those who resisted the occupation, who refused to collaborate with the occupiers, who ended up imprisoned — did it all for nothing. But that is not true. It is precisely because of them that Crimea remains Ukrainian — politically, culturally, in the hearts of millions.

Ukraine does not trade its people nor its land. Crimea cannot be a ‘bargaining chip.’ Anyone who thinks that recognizing Crimea as Russian would end the war is gravely mistaken. It would create a precedent that aggression and occupation are acceptable. Ukraine will not allow that.

Liza Sivets, 31, working in the public history field

I was very lucky to be born in Crimea and live there for 20 years, until 2014, so all my childhood and carefree youth are associated with the peninsula. I grew up by the sea, in a place with the most beautiful sunsets. I traveled all over Crimea with my family, school travel group, and university friends. This region is extremely rich in history, including tragic and little-talked-about history, and this influenced what I chose to do as my work.

But Crimea is not just memories for me. These are people whom Russia imprisoned or forced to leave their homes because of their beliefs. These are the people who still live there, under occupation and propaganda, and force themselves to remain silent so that this Russian repressive machine does not hit their families as well.

I see it as a defeat of American democracy and a confirmation that the U.S. is aligning itself with Russia. Overall, I am disappointed but not surprised. If this recognition happens, me and other residents of Crimea will feel even more betrayed and hopeless.

Thousands of internally displaced people and refugees are unlikely to be able to return home, see their loved ones, or visit their family graves. And people in Crimea, who are waiting for justice and Ukraine’s return, will suffer even more repression from Russia.

In fact, by this recognition, the United States is telling Russia that the crimes it commits are acceptable, that it will not be punished, and that it can continue. If Trump is so eager to please (Vladimir) Putin, he might as well hand over one of the American states to Russia.

Khrystyna Burdym, 35, culture and art worker, the Crimea exhibition curator

Unfortunately, my memories are still very childish. The last time I was in Crimea was when I was about 10 years old.

For me, Crimea is, first and foremost, an image of carefree days. I associate it with nature, with my family, with the people with whom we traveled there on vacation, and with friends who lived on the peninsula before it was occupied.

Crimea is also about health, Crimean Tatar cuisine, and happy parents.

Unfortunately, at the time, I didn’t fully grasp the depth, uniqueness, and significance of the peninsula. I knew far less about it than I would have liked — its history, culture, and the Crimean Tatars. It was still the 2000s, and back then, Crimea wasn’t as visible or widely discussed as it is today.

But thanks to the exhibition we organized for the Crimean Platform, it felt like I returned those memories, while also hearing an incredible number of stories from artists, from those who were born in Crimea.

This statement (about the U.S.’s possible recognition of Russian control over Crimea) has been in the air for a long time. But until recently, I hoped that a country with such influence and weight would not say it out loud.

Of course, such things are unsettling. They are troubling. But I hope that for Ukrainians, as well as for everyone who supports us around the world, this will be nothing more than a temporary shock after which we will return to the fight even more resolutely.

Putting aside geopolitics, what hurts me the most right now is what’s happening with my friends, those who are from Crimea. They have been unable to return home since 2014. Some of them have not seen their families for years. This is unfair. It is painful.

And I want to make it clear once again: this occupation is temporary. I believe in it. As I think most Ukrainians do. And many people in the world do, too.

Crimean Tatar artist, 40

(Anonymous for security reasons)

Me and my family in Crimea have a negative attitude toward Trump’s potential recognition of Crimea as Russian. It’s not even a topic of discussion in my family circles. For them, it’s unacceptable when people say that Crimea will never return to Ukraine.

If Crimea becomes Russian, I can only imagine the repression and added pressure that would fall on those with a Crimean Tatar identity or views that are not tolerant of Russia.

There’s also a specific problem for representatives of the Crimean Tatar community who have to hide their names because it poses a threat to their relatives in Crimea. Even soldiers fighting for Ukraine, when they are buried, are not always publicly named. For us, anything that requires publicity is restricted.

A close relative of mine, a retiree (from Crimea), said: ‘That’s impossible, they won’t recognize it — the people of Ukraine do not support this. Sooner or later, Crimea will return to Ukraine.'

The war in Ukraine would end “instantly” if Kyiv agreed to withdraw from territory it currently controls and abandon its NATO ambitions, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said in an interview with the French outlet Le Point on April 23, reiterating conditions that Ukraine and its allies have repeatedly rejected.

Peskov laid out Moscow’s demands for a ceasefire, including the full recognition of Russia’s claim over four Ukrainian oblasts it partially occupies, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia, neutral status for Ukraine, and an end to all Western military support.

“If Ukraine lays down its arms and withdraws from these regions, military operations will stop instantly,” Peskov said. “These four regions are inscribed in our constitution as an integral part of Russia."

The Kremlin illegally annexed the four territories following sham referenda in late 2022, including the Ukrainian oblasts as part of Russia in the constitution — in a move that holds no weight internationally.

Although Moscow has declared all four oblasts and the Crimean Peninsula as part of Russia, it does not fully control them. Russia currently occupies about 20% of Ukraine’s territory, including nearly all of Luhansk Oblast, two-thirds of Donetsk, and approximately 73% of both Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, as well as the entirety of Crimea, which it illegally annexed in 2014.

Peskov also rejected the legitimacy of the so-called “coalition of the willing,” a group of 31 nations that has pledged to send peacekeeping forces and offer security guarantees to Ukraine in the event of a peace agreement.

“Whether this coalition exists before or after the signing of an agreement is a detail for us,” he said. “The most important thing is the location of these soldiers.” Russia considers any deployment of foreign troops, particularly from NATO countries, a security risk, according to Peskov.

Asked whether Russia would consider further military expansion beyond Ukraine, Peskov dismissed the idea. He insisted Russia has “no problems or territorial claims” toward the Baltic or Nordic states. Russia also denied it was planning to invade Ukraine just before the start of its full-scale invasion in February 2022.

The Kremlin spokesperson also praised U.S. President Donald Trump as a “strong leader” willing to engage in dialogue, suggesting this differentiated him from the previous U.S. administration. “Putin appreciates strong men,” he said.

The Trump administration’s final proposal for ending the Russia-Ukraine war reportedly includes major concessions to Russia, including the U.S.’s de jure recognition of Russia’s control over Crimea, along with de facto recognition of its occupation of other Ukrainian territories, Axios reported on April 22, citing sources.

Ukraine’s leadership along with its European partners have firmly rejected any deal that concedes sovereign territory.

“This violates our Constitution. This is our territory, the territory of the people of Ukraine,” President Volodymyr Zelensky said on April 22.

Ukraine has no great options if Trump recognizes Crimea as Russian

Ukraine is facing a crossroads in its fight against Russia’s full-scale invasion, with the possibility of being forced to reject an unfavorable peace deal being imposed under huge pressure from the U.S. The red line for Kyiv could be a reported proposal from the White House that would give

The Kyiv IndependentChris York