-
Russian court convicts 184 Ukrainian POWs captured in Kursk Oblast of terrorism, Mediazona reports
A Russian military court has convicted 184 Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) captured in Kursk Oblast of acts of terrorism, Mediazona reported on June 25.
Ukraine first launched a surprise offensive into Russia’s Kursk Oblast in August 2024. Ukrainian officials have said the incursion forced Russia to move resources away from its offensives in Eastern Ukraine.
Russia’s military prosecutors office convicts Ukrainian POWs captured in Kursk Oblast on a regular basis, independent Russian outlet Mediazona reported.
The POWs captured in Kursk were charged with carrying out a grave terrorist act by a group of individuals, as outlined by the Russian Criminal Code.
Junior Lieutenant Yevhen Hoch was convicted of allegedly carrying out an act of terrorism by taking part in Ukraine’s Kursk Oblast incursion.
Russia has waged its war against Ukraine since 2014 and initiated a full-scale invasion in February 2022.
Russian authorities accused Hoch of interfering with civilian evacuations for three weeks amid Ukraine’s Kursk offensive and for “intimidating them by openly carrying and using combat weapons."
Russia regularly convicts people of politically motivated charges in an effort to silence opposition to its war against Ukraine.
The Russian 2nd Western District Military Court has carried out the sentences against the 184 Ukrainian POWs since the beginning of the year.
Moscow has gone after journalists in Ukraine’s Russian-occupied territories. Ukrainian Journalist Viktoriia Roshchyna disappeared in August 2023 and died after being tortured in Russian captivity. Roschyna’s body was returned to Ukraine in February with missing organs.
Putin insists the Russian economy is fine, but Kremlin officials say otherwiseIn a rare public sign that all is not well in Russia, two high-ranking Moscow officials last week issued separate warnings about the state of the country’s economy. Russian Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina and Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov both highlighted that amid the Kremlin’s full-scale war against Ukraine, the tools Moscow once relied on to maintain wartime growth are nearly exhausted. Almost immediately, Russian President Vladimir Putin on June 20 dismissed the concerns, claiThe Kyiv IndependentTim Zadorozhnyy
-
Explosions reported in Moscow, airport restrictions imposed as Russian authorities claim drone attack
Editor’s note: This is a developing story and is being updated.
Explosions were reported in Moscow overnight on June 26, with Mayor Sergey Sobyanin claiming two drones were shot down by air defenses.
Two drones were shot down, Sobyanin said, adding that emergency services are responding at the wreckage sites.
Ukraine’s military regularly strikes military targets deep within Russia in an attempt to diminish Moscow’s fighting power as it continues its war against Ukraine.
Explosions were reportedly heard in the city, independent media reported, citing Moscow’s residents.
The Kyiv Independent could not independently verify these claims.
Kaluga airport and Moscow’s Vnukovo airport had flight restrictions imposed amid the drone attack, Artyom Korenyako, a spokesperson for Russia’s state aviation agency Rosaviatsia, said early on June 26.
“The airport is temporarily not accepting or sending flights. Aircraft crews, air traffic controllers, and airport services must take all necessary measures to ensure flight safety,” he said.
The restrictions were later lifted.
On June 1, Ukraine launched a game-changing drone attack on four key Russian military airfields, damaging 41 planes, including heavy bombers and rare A-50 spy planes.
Kyiv claimed it disabled 34% of Russia’s strategic bomber fleet in what is seen as one of the most daring operations during Russia’s full-scale war.
Ukraine’s military intelligence agency was behind explosions near Desantnaya Bay in Russia’s far eastern Vladivostok on May 30, which reportedly damaged military personnel and equipment, a source in HUR told the Kyiv Independent.
Ukraine war latest: US signals more Patriot missiles for Kyiv after Zelensky-Trump talks at NATO summitKey developments on June 25: * Zelensky, Trump hold talks on NATO summit sidelines * ‘Something unknown’ hits key Russian drone facility in Taganrog, Ukrainian official says * Russia has launched over 28,000 Shahed drones at Ukraine since 2022, with nearly 10% fired in June alone, Zelensky says * Donetsk Oblast city “onThe Kyiv IndependentThe Kyiv Independent news desk
-
NATO allies surprised by Rubio's inconsistency on Russia sanctions, POLITICO reports
United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio surprised NATO allies this week with conflicting messages on Russia sanctions, delivering a tougher stance in private than in his public remarks, POLITICO reported on June 25.
Rubio met with NATO foreign ministers on June 25 during a private dinner at the alliance’s annual summit. According to sources who spoke with POLITICO, Rubio acknowledged that Russia was the main obstacle preventing peace talks to end the war in Ukraine.
He reportedly said the U.S. Senate would likely consider new sanctions legislation after completing work on President Donald Trump’s spending bill.
However, just hours later, Rubio softened his position on Russia during an exclusive interview with POLITICO, calling for a more cautious approach.
“If we did what everybody here wants us to do, and that is come in and crush them with more sanctions, we probably lose our ability to talk to them about the ceasefire and then who’s talking to them?” Rubio said.
He also added that Trump would know the “time and place” to change course.
When asked about the apparent shift in tone, a senior U.S. official insisted Rubio’s messaging has remained consistent in conversations with allies.
“The secretary has been very consistent in meeting and calls with his counterparts on three key point,” the official said.
“One is that the president believes strongly that the only way this war ends is through negotiations; second, as soon as the U.S. imposes new sanctions on Russia the opportunity for the U.S. to be involved in those negotiations closes; and third, that the Senate, in America anyway, is an independent body that at some point is going to move on those sanctions,."
At the NATO dinner, Rubio reportedly faced criticism from Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski, who claimed that Russian President Vladimir Putin was disrespecting Trump by violating the ceasefire.
It has been more than 100 days since Ukraine agreed to a U.S.-backed complete ceasefire, while Russia continues to reject it.
Sikorski also reportedly denounced Moscow’s repeated attacks on Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities, which have intensified in recent weeks, saying such strikes “should not come for free” — implying that the U.S. and Europe should do more to support Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Rubio has delivered different messages in public and behind closed doors. Despite the shifting rhetoric, Baltic and Nordic countries reportedly view him as a pragmatic ally within the Trump administration — one who has a realistic understanding of the threats posed by Russia and China, according to a second European official cited by POLITICO.
Ukraine war latest: US signals more Patriot missiles for Kyiv after Zelensky-Trump talks at NATO summitKey developments on June 25: * Zelensky, Trump hold talks on NATO summit sidelines * ‘Something unknown’ hits key Russian drone facility in Taganrog, Ukrainian official says * Russia has launched over 28,000 Shahed drones at Ukraine since 2022, with nearly 10% fired in June alone, Zelensky says * Donetsk Oblast city “onThe Kyiv IndependentThe Kyiv Independent news desk
-
Ukraine, Council of Europe sign historic agreement to establish tribunal on Russian aggression
Ukraine and the Council of Europe signed a historic agreement on June 25 to establish a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression , marking a major step toward holding Russia’s leadership accountable for launching the full-scale invasion in 2022.
The agreement was signed by President Volodymyr Zelensky and Council of Europe Secretary General Alain Berset during a ceremony in Strasbourg, France – following more than three years of diplomatic efforts and deliberation.
Speaking at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), Zelensky thanked the assembly and underscored the importance of justice.
“Everyone responsible for this war must be held to account,” he said. “Every war criminal must face justice – including Putin… the crime of aggression must be recorded, judged, and punished."
Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha reacted, calling the signing a “historic moment not only for Ukraine, but also for world justice."
The Special Tribunal will be established within the framework of the Council of Europe and will have the mandate to prosecute senior Russian leaders for the crime of aggression – defined as the decision to use armed force against another state, in violation of the United Nations Charter.
The tribunal is intended to close a key legal gap in existing international accountability mechanisms. While the International Criminal Court (ICC) has jurisdiction to investigate war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide in Ukraine – it cannot examine the crime of aggression due to jurisdictional constraints. The new tribunal will complement the ICC’s efforts by specifically targeting high-level officials responsible for starting the war.
President Zelensky has long advocated for the creation of the tribunal, emphasizing the need to bring Russian President Vladimir Putin and other senior officials to justice. Ukrainian prosecutors have documented thousands of war crimes committed by Russian forces, including attacks on civilians, cultural landmarks, medical facilities, and reports of torture and forced deportations.
The ICC has already issued arrest warrants for Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, the Russian official overseeing the forced deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia. While war crimes and crimes against humanity can be prosecuted at any level of command, the crime of aggression focuses exclusively on senior state officials responsible for planning and waging war.
In addition to the special tribunal, the Council of Europe’s Ukraine-related work also includes the Register of Damage, an initiative that has already received more than 34,000 claims detailing losses and harms resulting from Russia’s full-scale invasion. The establishment of the register was a significant international effort and the first step towards a mechanism to ensure justice and compensation for Ukraine and its people.
Zelensky, Trump hold talks on NATO summit sidelines“We covered all the truly important issues,” President Volodymyr Zelensky said. “We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer.”The Kyiv IndependentKateryna Denisova
-
Ukrainian author killed by Russia awarded UK’s prestigious Orwell Prize in political writing
Two years after her tragic death in a Russian missile strike, Ukrainian author Victoria Amelina was posthumously awarded on June 25 the prestigious U.K. Orwell Prize for her book “Looking at Women, Looking at War.”
Amelina was a finalist among notable nominees in the political non-fiction category, including American journalist Anne Applebaum.
Kim Darroch, the chair of judges for the Orwell Prize, called Amelina’s book “an unforgettable picture of the human consequences of war."
A famous Ukrainian author, Amelina took up work as a war crimes researcher following the start of Russia’s full-scale war in 2022.
The posthumous recognition of Amelina’s work is a bittersweet moment for Ukraine’s cultural sphere, which continues to lose artists to the war both on the front line and in attacks against civilians, while Russian artists — regardless of their positions — are being reintegrated into Western cultural life.
“It’s a significant victory for our culture — a book by a Ukrainian author, written in English, has received a prestigious international prize,” journalist and cultural manager Tetyana Teren, who was a close friend of Amelina, told the Kyiv Independent.
“I’m certain that if she were still with us, Victoria would have used this recognition to share vital messages with an international audience about the true reasons behind Russia’s imperial war against Ukraine and Europe and about the urgent need to keep fighting for the future, even as some foreign politicians call for peace without justice built on compromise with the aggressor."
Amelina is among the 208 Ukrainian artists who have been killed by Russia since 2022, according to statistics provided by Ukraine’s Culture Ministry in mid-June.
Amelina died on July 1 after succumbing to serious injuries sustained in a Russian missile strike on Kramatorsk in Ukraine’s eastern Donetsk Oblast. She was only 37 years old and is survived by her son.
Amelina was in Kramatorsk with a delegation of Colombian writers and journalists when two Russian Iskander missiles struck their location in a popular downtown restaurant. Twelve other people were killed in the strike and 60 were wounded.
Kramatorsk is a frequent target of Russian attacks due to its role as a logistical hub for Ukrainian forces.
A woman in mourning holds a portrait of late Ukrainian author Victoria Amelina during a funeral ceremony at St. Michael’s Golden-Domed Monastery in Kyiv, Ukraine, on July 4, 2023. (Vitalii Nosach / Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images) At the time of Amelina’s murder, the manuscript for “Looking at Women, Looking at War” remained incomplete.
A group of her closest friends and colleagues undertook the responsibility of finalizing the manuscript for publication, striving to minimize editorial intervention in order to preserve the integrity and authenticity of her voice.
“When I read the first couple of chapters of Victoria Amelina’s manuscript in late 2023, the words ‘Orwell Prize’ popped up in my mind,” academic Sasha Dovzhyk, who was part of the editorial team, told the Kyiv Independent. “Victoria’s gift for drawing parallels between past and present, her political vision, and her drive in the pursuit of justice were conveyed in lucid and elegant prose, much in the spirit of George Orwell.”
“And then this polished text fell apart, disassembled into notes and unfinished chapters, which in themselves have become a testimony of Russia’s war crimes and its attempts to erase Ukrainian culture.”
“Looking at Women, Looking at War” explores both the resilience and adversity faced by Ukrainian women during the war, including figures such as human rights lawyer and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Oleksandra Matviichuk and artist Liubov Panchenko.
“I see the tremendous efforts you and your colleagues make to give justice a chance,” Amelina writes Matviichuk, as she details in the book.
“Yet despite all our efforts, we still might lose. And if we lose, I want at least to tell the story of our pursuit of justice.”
The cover of Victoria Amelina’s book “Looking at Women, Looking at War” and a photograph of women and children at a makeshift memorial at the site of a missile attack in Sumy, Ukraine, on April 14, 2025. (Roman Pilipey / AFP via Getty Images) Alongside these accounts, the book also traces Amelina’s personal journey into investigating war crimes, highlighting the emotional toll of juggling such harrowing work with motherhood.
Previous winners of the Orwell Prize in the political writing category include American journalist Joshua Yaffa’s book “Between Two Fires: Truth, Ambition, and Compromise in Putin’s Russia” in 2021 and “Say Nothing: A True Story of Murder and Memory in Northern Ireland” by American journalist Patrick Radden Keefe in 2019.
Amelina is the first Ukrainian writer to receive the prize.
Amelina was among Ukraine’s most prolific young authors, having transitioned from a career in IT to full-time writing in 2015. Before the full-scale invasion, she actively published fiction, poetry, and children’s literature.
Her debut novel, “The Fall Syndrome” (2015), centers on the events of the 2014 Revolution of Dignity, also known as the EuroMaidan.
Her 2017 novel, “Dom’s Dream Kingdom,” explores the life of a Soviet colonel’s family living in 1990s Lviv in the childhood apartment once lived in by Polish-Jewish writer Stanislaw Lem.
Her work has also been translated into a number of languages, including English, Polish, Italian, Spanish, German, Croatian, Dutch, Czech, and Hungarian.
Note from the author:
Hi there, it’s Kate Tsurkan, thanks for reading my latest artice. I was overcome with such strong emotions when I learned that Victoria Amelina won this prestigious literary prize. She was my friend, and I can’t help but think not only of the time we spent together but of the loss of a great literary voice that Russia stole from this world. Please read her book, and don’t let her work ever be forgotten. Also, if you like reading about this sort of thing, please consider supporting us and becoming a member of the Kyiv Independent today.
Russia killed Ukrainian author Victoria Amelina — but not her words or quest for justiceUkrainian author Victoria Amelina never got to finish writing her book “Looking at Women, Looking at War.” After she was killed in a Russian missile strike on Kramatorsk in Ukraine’s eastern Donetsk Oblast in 2023, it fell upon her closest friends and colleagues to do what they could toThe Kyiv IndependentKate Tsurkan
-
Diplomacy or deal-making? Unpacking the U.S.-Belarus prisoner deal
After a high-level U.S. visit to Belarus led to the release of 14 prisoners, observers have been left wondering what autocrat Alexander Lukashenko may have secured in return.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s special envoy to Ukraine and Russia Keith Kellogg’s visit to Minsk on June 21 marked the highest-level diplomatic contact the isolated regime of Alexander Lukashenko had with the U.S. in years.
The trip was also marked by the freeing by the Lukashenko regime of 14 prisoners, including one of the most notable of Lukashenko’s political opponents — Siarhei Tsikhanouski.
With the released prisoners in the spotlight, both parties to the negotiations were vague regarding the results of the meeting. But members of the Belarusian opposition in exile and political analysts all agreed Lukashenko was seeking some form of international legitimacy, as well as sanctions relief.
“For Lukashenko, the visit is a fairly strong legitimizing step,” said Lesia Rudnik, the director of an exiled independent Belarusian think tank, the Center for New Ideas.
“I believe we’re at the beginning of a dialogue … but I think we’ll see a rather slow development of the situation.”
Lukashenko has been ostracized by the West over his support for Russia’s war against Ukraine and brutal suppression of freedoms in Belarus. His international contacts have been limited to China, Vietnam, Iran, and African states that have minimal trade turnover with Belarus, and, increasingly, local Russian officials. The only Western nations that have thus far broken the diplomatic freeze are Russia-sympathetic EU states Hungary and Slovakia.
As for the U.S., analysts suggest Washington could have been looking to deter deeper Belarusian involvement in the war, while also possibly securing a foreign policy win for Trump amid stalled peace negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow.
Carefully choreographed breakthrough
The trail to Kellogg’s top-level meeting in Minsk was blazed nearly a year ago under the administration of former U.S. President Joe Biden, with low-profile behind-the-scenes meetings and occasional prisoner releases.
The most tangible result of Kellogg’s mission was the sudden freeing of 14 prisoners, including Tsikhanouski, former RFE/RL journalist Ihar Karnei, and citizens of Estonia, Latvia, and Poland, who were released from prisons in Belarus and delivered to neighboring Lithuania. U.S. President Donald Trump marked the release with a celebratory post on his social media platform, Truth Social.
“President Trump now has the power and opportunity to free all political prisoners in Belarus just like that. And I ask him to do so.”
Once seen as an unlikely candidate for early release, Tsikhanouski was freed after serving five years of a nearly 20-year sentence. Jailed ahead of Belarus’s 2020 presidential election, his arrest prompted his wife, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, to run in his place. Despite election observers finding she had won the election, Lukashenko claimed victory, sparking mass protests in Belarus that lasted for months.
At a press conference in Vilnius following his release, Tsikhanouski appealed to Trump to help free other political prisoners in Belarus.
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya holds a photo of her jailed husband Siarhei Tsikhanouski as other demonstrators display images of Belarusian opposition figures Maria Kalesnikava and Viktar Babaryka during a protest in front of the Belarusian Embassy in Vilnius, Lithuania, on March 8, 2024. (Petras Malukas / AFP via Getty Images) “President Trump now has the power and opportunity to free all political prisoners in Belarus just like that. And I ask him to do so,” Tsikhanouski said.
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, who, since being forced into exile, has led the Belarusian opposition, hailed the releases, pledging to “continue to work closely with President Trump’s administration and with all our allies on both sides of the Atlantic to achieve the freedom of every political prisoner.”
European leaders, including EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, European Parliament President Roberta Metsola, Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski, and others, also welcomed the U.S. diplomatic efforts and the freeing of the political prisoners.
Following four years of continuous, harsh repression, Lukashenko suddenly pardoned 18 political prisoners in July 2024, then continued to release small batches of political prisoners every month for half a year. Tsikhanouski said he had heard talk of his potential release in August 2024.
In February, U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Christopher W. Smith made an unannounced visit to Belarus, securing the release of a U.S. citizen and two Belarusian political prisoners.
John Coale, Kellogg’s deputy, during a low-profile visit to Minsk in May facilitated the release of dual U.S.-Belarusian citizen Yuras Ziankovich. The earlier contacts paved the way for Kellogg’s high-profile visit, accompanied by Smith and Coale.
The publicity surrounding the visit indicates that the parties “have reached a minimum level of mutual trust,” commented Valery Kavaleuski, a former Belarusian diplomat and ex-member of Tsikhanouskaya’s shadow cabinet. He is currently advocating for the release of political prisoners as the head of the Euro-Atlantic Affairs Agency.
Restoring ties?
One thing Belarusian officials did signal was that they expect more in return, including full restoration of bilateral ties and sanctions relief.
Belarus’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Valentin Rybakov, on state-owned Belarusian television after the Kellogg meeting, said that Minsk seeks to “normalize” bilateral relations with the U.S., which would entail the full resumption of embassy operations in both countries and exchanges of visits by officials.
Alexander Lukashenko (C) meets with U.S. presidential envoy Keith Kellogg and members of the American delegation in Minsk, Belarus, on June 21, 2025. (X/Keith Kellogg) The U.S. withdrew its diplomats and shut down embassy operations in Minsk in February 2022, following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which involved the use by the Russian military of Belarusian territory. According to Kavaleuski, the reopening of the embassy lies within U.S. interests in observing and gathering information on the ground. Reopening at the Charge d'Affaires level, as opposed to the ambassadorial level, does not imply any formal recognition of Lukashenko’s legitimacy.
“Without Europe's participation, the ‘de-isolation’ of the Belarusian regime will not be as effective.”
On sanctions relief, Rybakov and Natallia Esismant, Lukashenko’s press secretary, noted that this had been among the priority topics of the discussion. The New York Times also reported that the matter was discussed during Khristopher Smith’s visit to Belarus in February.
“According to our information, Lukashenko is setting a condition for the lifting of the American sanctions on (potash producer) Belaruskali,” opposition activist and leader of the People’s Anti-Crisis Management initiative, Pavel Latushka, told the Kyiv Independent.
“The second is the financial sector, which enables financial payments,” he added. “The third is the Belavia (…) aircraft fleet, which includes (Lukashenko’s) planes.”
In 2019, before Belarus spiraled into political turmoil, potash, its top export, brought in approximately $2.9 billion in export revenues. After the EU and U.S. export restrictions were put in place, Belarus’s share of the global potash market dropped from 18% in 2021 to 8% in 2023, according to the International Food Policy Research Institute. Around 5% of the market was lost in the United States.
“But without Europe's participation, the ‘de-isolation’ of the Belarusian regime will not be as effective,” Rudnik from the Center for New Ideas told the Kyiv Independent, noting that while the U.S. can cancel its own sanctions, Washington would have to lobby for their relief in Europe.
Analysts agree that to restore the flow of this crucial export, Belarus needs to ease European sanctions and overcome opposition from Lithuania, home to Klaipeda seaport, formerly the chief transit hub for Belarusian potash.
Initially introduced in 2021 for human rights abuses, European sanctions on Belarusian potash were re-qualified as sanctions for Minsk’s support for Russia’s war against Ukraine, making them impossible to cancel until the war ends, former diplomat Kavaleuski says, citing his recent exchanges in Brussels.
Belarus, in contrast, expects reciprocal steps and a "good-neighborly approach” after releasing citizens of Estonia, Latvia, and Poland, said Belarus’s KGB Chief Ivan Tsertsel on state-run media, in an apparent reference to European opposition to sanctions relief. Notably, no Lithuanian citizens were included in the release.
But the European Union has so far shown no inclination to reduce restrictions on Lukashenko. Quite the opposite: the 18th sanctions package, recently blocked by Hungary and Slovakia, proposes to ban all transactions with Belarusian banks, further tightening restrictions against Belarus.
"It’s Lukashenko who pushes Belarus closer to Russia because it’s comfortable for him."
And Lithuania, one of the EU member states with the strongest voice on the Belarusian issue, sees no grounds for reconsidering sanctions yet, according to Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys. Aware of the potential for a veto by Hungary or Slovakia on Europe-wide sanctions, the Baltic state is developing legislation for national economic sanctions that would provide for the introduction of personal and sectoral restrictions.
While thankful for the release and hopeful for more good news, the Belarusian opposition is cautious about rewarding the regime too soon.
Russian President Vladimir Putin (C), Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko (L), and State Duma Chairman Vyacheslav Volodin (R) attend the Great Heritage – Common Future Forum in Volgograd, Russia, on April 29, 2025. (Contributor / Getty Images) “Naturally, if the repression stops, and all the prisoners are released, it would open new possibilities, and one could talk about certain relief from the American sanctions,” Tsikhanouskaya’s advisor Viachorka says, adding that at this point, only 1.5% of the country’s 1,100 political prisoners have been released through U.S. mediation.
“There’s no trust in Lukashenko,” said exiled activist Latushka, who is known for his more hawkish approach to contacts with the Lukashenko regime.
“Over the 30 years of his rule, Lukashenko has repeatedly used this scheme of easing sanctions by making cosmetic concessions to the West.”
Latushka argues that sanctions should be eased only after the release of all political prisoners, a halt to repression, and the decriminalization of political life within the country. Even after that, restrictions should be suspended but not cancelled to ensure the possibility of swift reinstatement in case of backsliding by Minsk, he said.
But having released 14 prisoners, Belarusian KGB Chief Tsertsel reported that another 14 foreign and Belarusian citizens had been arrested in Belarus on charges of espionage and high treason in 2025 — in a sign the regime's "conveyor belt" of repression has far from slowed down.
Washington's interest in Minsk
Following his visit to Minsk, Kellogg shared that while his deputy John Coale led discussions on the release of prisoners, he had focused on the Russia-Ukraine War.
“We know Trump is, first and foremost, a dealmaker, and secondly, that success is important to him,” Rudnik said of the interest of the Trump administration in dealing with Belarus.
“And when this does not happen for a long time, especially when he promised so much in his election campaign, it becomes necessary to compensate for the lack of these victories with smaller victories, perhaps even a lot of them,” she said.
Observers interviewed by the Kyiv Independent do not believe Belarus could serve as a credible platform for the stalled Russian-Ukrainian peace negotiations — an idea that has been floated by the Kremlin, but flatly rejected by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky over Belarus's complicity in the war.
U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington, DC, on June 10, 2025. (Saul Loeb / AFP via Getty Images) While not having sent his troops into battle in Ukraine, Lukashenko let the Russian army use Belarusian territory to mount attacks on Ukraine at the start of the invasion. He also reoriented the Belarusian military-industrial complex to serve Russian defense contracts, according to a recent report by the Belarusian opposition group Belpol.
Aside from “scoring a win” easier than stopping Russia’s war, Washington may have warned Belarus against becoming more deeply engaged in the Kremlin’s war against Ukraine, or escalating tensions with the NATO and EU member states bordering Belarus, analysts suggest.
“Belarus is strategically placed on NATO’s eastern flank between Russia and western states,” Tsikhanouskaya’s advisor Viachorka says. “The less of a threat Belarus is, the less defense spending for America.”
Belarus is set to host the Zapad-2025 (West 2025) joint military drills with Russia in September. After the Russia-Belarus Union Resolve 2021 drills were used to disguise the buildup of Russian troops ahead of an all-out invasion, any joint drills in Belarus are now seen as a serious cause for concern among its neighbors.
In an apparent effort to assuage those fears, in May, Belarusian Defense Minister Viktar Khrenin announced the drills would involve fewer troops and would be held at a location further from the border.
The Kellogg visit, Latushka believes, also had the aim of determining whether Lukashenko is capable of altering his domestic or foreign policy, and the extent of the Kremlin’s influence over him.
Americanist and advisor to the Euro-Atlantic Affairs Agency Anton Penkovski told the Kyiv Independent that the Trump administration might be considering the possibilities for the “Finlandisation” of Belarus, a term that implies Minsk would loosen its military ties with Moscow without fully breaking off ties.
And while having nothing to lose in the event of negotiations failing, U.S. diplomats might also have been investigating Lukashenko’s ability to act independently and engage in separate negotiations in the event of Russia being weakened.
Indeed, Washington has a history of engaging with Minsk at times when tensions with Moscow heighten.
Viachorka, however, is not so sure.
“We often hear the message that we need to save Lukashenko from Russia, including from Belarusian propaganda,” he says. “But it’s Lukashenko who pushes Belarus closer to Russia because it’s comfortable for him.”
Subscribe to the NewsletterBelarus Weekly<span data-sanitized-id="belarus-weekly-info" data-sanitized-class="belarusWeekly__info"></span> <button data-sanitized-id="belarus-weekly-subscribe-btn" data-sanitized-class="belarusWeekly__form_button"> <span data-sanitized-class="belarusWeekly__form_label">Join us</span> <path d="M4.45953 12.8114H7.90953C8.00052 12.8127 8.09085 12.7958 8.17517 12.7616C8.25949 12.7274 8.3361 12.6766 8.40044 12.6123C8.46478 12.548 8.51556 12.4714 8.54975 12.387C8.58395 12.3027 8.60088 12.2124 8.59953 12.1214C8.58173 11.9269 8.48974 11.7467 8.34265 11.6183C8.19555 11.4898 8.00465 11.4229 7.80953 11.4314H4.45953C4.27653 11.4314 4.10103 11.5041 3.97163 11.6335C3.84223 11.7629 3.76953 11.9384 3.76953 12.1214C3.76953 12.3044 3.84223 12.4799 3.97163 12.6093C4.10103 12.7387 4.27653 12.8114 4.45953 12.8114Z" fill="white"></path> <path d="M8.6 15.0114C8.60135 14.9204 8.58442 14.83 8.55022 14.7457C8.51603 14.6614 8.46525 14.5848 8.40091 14.5205C8.33656 14.4561 8.25996 14.4053 8.17564 14.3711C8.09131 14.3369 8.00098 14.32 7.91 14.3214H2.69C2.507 14.3214 2.3315 14.3941 2.2021 14.5235C2.0727 14.6529 2 14.8284 2 15.0114C2 15.1944 2.0727 15.3699 2.2021 15.4993C2.3315 15.6287 2.507 15.7014 2.69 15.7014H7.81C8.00511 15.7099 8.19602 15.643 8.34311 15.5145C8.49021 15.386 8.5822 15.2058 8.6 15.0114Z" fill="white"></path> <path d="M24.4202 6.01122H7.55022C7.43403 5.99626 7.31641 5.99626 7.20022 6.01122L7.08022 6.06122C6.85578 6.16602 6.66595 6.33276 6.53308 6.54181C6.4002 6.75086 6.32982 6.99352 6.33022 7.24122C6.32744 7.43266 6.36832 7.62222 6.44976 7.79549C6.5312 7.96876 6.65105 8.1212 6.80022 8.24122L12.5802 13.4512L6.89022 18.7112C6.71923 18.8375 6.57973 19.0016 6.4826 19.1907C6.38546 19.3797 6.33331 19.5887 6.33022 19.8012C6.32652 20.0535 6.3952 20.3015 6.52812 20.516C6.66105 20.7304 6.85264 20.9023 7.08022 21.0112C7.14691 21.0484 7.21729 21.0786 7.29022 21.1012C7.46476 21.1609 7.64625 21.1979 7.83022 21.2112H24.5102C24.8263 21.2048 25.1378 21.1355 25.4268 21.0074C25.7158 20.8792 25.9763 20.6948 26.1932 20.4648C26.4101 20.2349 26.579 19.9641 26.6901 19.6681C26.8012 19.3722 26.8522 19.0571 26.8402 18.7412V8.47122C26.8278 7.82952 26.5701 7.21694 26.12 6.7594C25.6699 6.30185 25.0616 6.03412 24.4202 6.01122ZM8.57022 8.08122L7.92022 7.49122H24.4202L16.4902 14.6812C16.407 14.7305 16.312 14.7565 16.2152 14.7565C16.1185 14.7565 16.0235 14.7305 15.9402 14.6812L8.57022 8.08122ZM7.73022 19.7912L8.48022 19.1112L13.4802 14.5812L14.8802 15.8612C15.1804 16.157 15.5793 16.3315 16.0002 16.3512C16.4212 16.3315 16.82 16.157 17.1202 15.8612L18.5202 14.5812L24.2002 19.8012H7.73022V19.7912ZM25.3502 18.7112L19.6602 13.5912L25.3502 8.37122V18.7112Z" fill="white"></path> </button> </div>
Why Russian economy warnings might be the only thing out of Moscow you can actually believeIn a rare public sign that all is not well in Russia, two high-ranking Moscow officials last week issued separate warnings about the state of the country’s economy. Russian Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina and Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov both highlighted that amid the Kremlin’s full-scale war against Ukraine, the tools Moscow once relied on to maintain wartime growth are nearly exhausted. Almost immediately, Russian President Vladimir Putin on June 20 dismissed the concerns, claiThe Kyiv IndependentTim Zadorozhnyy
Ukraine war latest: US signals more Patriot missiles for Kyiv after Zelensky-Trump talks at NATO summit
Key developments on June 25:
- Zelensky, Trump hold talks on NATO summit sidelines
- ‘Something unknown’ hits key Russian drone facility in Taganrog, Ukrainian official says
- Russia has launched over 28,000 Shahed drones at Ukraine since 2022, with nearly 10% fired in June alone, Zelensky says
- Donetsk Oblast city “on brink of humanitarian catastrophe,” governor says as drones cripple infrastructure
President Volodymyr Zelensky met with U.S. President Donald Trump at the NATO summit in The Hague on June 25.
The meeting lasted approximately 50 minutes, according to Suspilne. In a post on X, Zelensky described the conversation as “long and substantive."
“We covered all the truly important issues,” he wrote. “We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer."
Zelensky said that he briefed Trump about the situation on the battlefield.
“Putin is definitely not winning,” Ukraine’s president said.
The two leaders also discussed the purchase of American air defense systems as well as the potential for co-production of drones.
“Ukraine is ready to buy this equipment and support American weapons manufacturers,” Zelensky added.
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to media at the start of the second day of the 2025 NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands on June 25, 2025. (Nick Allard/The Kyiv Independent) Speaking at a press conference following the meeting, Trump said that it “couldn’t have been nicer."
“I think it’s a great time to end it (war). I’m going to speak to Vladimir Putin, see if we can get it ended,” Trump said. “He (Zelensky) is fighting a brave battle, it’s a tough battle."
He also signaled support for sending to Kyiv additional missiles for its Patriot air defense systems.
“They (Ukraine) do want to have the anti missiles, as they call them, the Patriots, and we’re going to see if we can make some available,” Trump said.
“They are very hard to get. We need them too. We are supplying them for Israel, and they are very effective."
NATO member states have agreed to a new defense spending benchmark, committing to allocate 5% of their gross domestic product annually to defense and security-related expenditures by 2035.
Unlike in previous years, this year’s NATO statement does not include a direct condemnation of Russia’s actions, unlike the communique issued during the 2024 NATO summit in Washington, which explicitly condemned Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
But the leaders reaffirmed support for Ukraine, stating that direct contributions to Ukraine’s defense and industrial capacity will be counted toward the 5% total.
With Trump disengaged and EU complacent, Ukrainian reforms lose momentumRussia’s all-out war has accelerated Ukraine’s push to join the European Union and NATO, as well as its dependency on Western loans and aid. Before, these things would have been heavily preconditioned on Ukraine implementing crucial reforms. However, the war has also eased the pressure on Kyiv to carry outThe Kyiv IndependentOleg Sukhov
‘Something unknown’ hits key Russian drone facility in Taganrog, Ukrainian official says
A key military-industrial site in the Russian city of Taganrog linked to Moscow’s production of combat drones and electronic warfare systems was damaged overnight, a Ukrainian official said on June 25, amid Russian reports of Ukrainian drones targeting the area.
“Something unknown flew into the Atlant-Aero plant in Taganrog,” Andrii Kovalenko, head of the counter-disinformation center at Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council said.
“This is an important node in the Russian military-industrial complex, specializing in components for combat drones and control systems."
Kovalenko said the plant is involved in the production of “Orion” drones, electronic warfare complexes, and digital integration systems for strike FPV (first-person-view) drones and loitering munitions.
Russian authorities reported a wave of overnight Ukrainian drone attacks across multiple regions, including Rostov, which borders eastern Ukraine. Russia’s Defense Ministry said its forces shot down 40 Ukrainian drones over several areas, including the Crimean Peninsula and seven over the Rostov region.
Rostov Governor Yuri Slyusar said on Telegram that while there were no casualties, the strikes allegedly caused a fire at a sports complex and damaged a high school and two residential buildings in Taganrog. In nearby Azov, a grain warehouse and industrial facility were hit, he added, without providing further detail.
The Kyiv Independent could not verify the claims.
Why Russian economy warnings might be the only thing out of Moscow you can actually believeIn a rare public sign that all is not well in Russia, two high-ranking Moscow officials last week issued separate warnings about the state of the country’s economy. Russian Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina and Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov both highlighted that amid the Kremlin’s full-scale war against Ukraine, the tools Moscow once relied on to maintain wartime growth are nearly exhausted. Almost immediately, Russian President Vladimir Putin on June 20 dismissed the concerns, claiThe Kyiv IndependentTim Zadorozhnyy
Russia has launched over 28,000 Shahed drones at Ukraine since 2022, with nearly 10% fired in June alone, Zelensky says
Since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, Moscow has launched 28,743 Shahed-type drones at Ukraine — with 2,736, or roughly 9.5%, fired in June 2025 alone, President Volodymyr Zelensky said during a speech to the Dutch Parliament in The Hague.
Speaking on June 24, he stressed that Russia would never have been able to carry out such drone attacks without support from Iran, and Ukraine, in turn, could not have intercepted most of the drones without the help of its international partners.
Zelensky called for accountability and emphasized that rules must apply to all — including the Kremlin: “Putin pretends not to understand the rules that shape the modern world. And here, in The Hague, I want to say this very clearly to him: There is a rule — do not kill. There is a rule — do not treat people like beasts. There is a rule — do not destroy cities and villages. There is a rule — do not sponsor terror. There is a rule — do not steal children. And if you break these rules, you will be held accountable."
Investigation: How Russia prepares its strategic missile plant for ‘eternal war’Key findings: * Despite international sanctions, Russia’s strategic missile plant was able to import complex machinery to dramatically increase missile production. * The Kyiv Independent has identified the equipment supplied to the plant, as well as the supply chains, mostly from China. * We located the plant’s new premises, built to house theThe Kyiv IndependentAlisa Yurchenko
Donetsk Oblast city ‘on brink of humanitarian catastrophe,’ governor says as drones cripple infrastructure
The front-line city of Kostiantynivka in Ukraine’s Donetsk Oblast is facing a looming “humanitarian catastrophe” as ongoing Russian strikes destroy critical infrastructure and leave thousands without basic services, Governor Vadym Filashkin said on June 25.
Kostiantynivka, in eastern Donetsk Oblast, lies just 10 to 15 kilometers (6 to 9 miles) from several areas currently occupied by Russian forces, according to battlefield mapping site DeepState. The city has come under intensified attacks in recent months as Moscow pushes westward beyond its gains around other nearby towns.
According to Filashkin, nearly half the city is without electricity due to shelling, and 1,900 households in the Santurynivka district have no access to gas, with restoration currently impossible. Water is supplied just once a day from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m., meeting only 20–25% of the city’s needs.
Ukraine’s Donetsk Oblast (Nizar al-Rifai/The Kyiv Independent) Drone strikes have halted all city bus operations, while the suburban route to Druzhkivka, a nearby town, is operating on a limited basis, Filashkin said.
Yevhen Alkhimov, press officer of Ukraine’s 28th Mechanized Brigade, which is fighting near Kostiantynivka, told the Kyiv Independent that “the greatest danger at the moment comes from first person view (FPV) drones, including fiber optic models."
“The enemy is trying to control all logistics and communication routes,” he said, adding: “The Russians’ goal right now is not so much to destroy the city as it is to make it unsuitable for defense by controlling all the roads."
Alkhimov said Russian forces were deliberately targeting vehicles including civilian buses.
“They are trying to fully control all movement in the city using their drones,” he said.
Authorities have installed seven large water tanks and 11 smaller containers throughout the city, in addition to 12 wells, six of which are equipped with filtration systems. Five “Points of Invincibility,” Ukraine’s emergency support hubs, are operational, with two more on standby.
Despite the risks, emergency crews, doctors, utility workers, and local officials continue to work in the city.
“Civilians still remain in the city, and life is becoming more and more difficult for them,” Alkhimov said.
“There are fewer people left, the curfew is now longer, but nonetheless, people are still there, and it is truly very dangerous for them to stay in the city."
Filashkin urged those still in the city to evacuate.
Note from the author:
Ukraine War Latest is put together by the Kyiv Independent news desk team, who keep you informed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you value our work and want to ensure we have the resources to continue, join the Kyiv Independent community.
Ukrainian Forces destroy Russian freight train near Tokmak
Ukrainian Forces have targeted and disrupted a Russian cargo train near Tokmak in the occupied Zaporizhzhia region. The operation, which took place at 11:15 AM, involved a combined effort from various units the Ukrainian Forces, who stopped the train on its tracks with none other than a precision strike, slicing it in half.
This train, comprising over 40 cars loaded with tanks, containers, and likely ammunition, was effectively split in two. Following this maneuver, Ukrainian units systematically targeted each train car.
This heavily laden train was transporting fuel and containers. Petro Andriushchenko highlighted that this operation marks a significant blow to Russian logistics, particularly carried out by the Southern Defense Forces. "A brilliant operation. P.S. Proofs are in place. The map location is highly accurate. But for now, let's stay focused on safety. The rest is coming. It will be something to watch, trust me, it's going to be pure ecstasy," concluded Andriushchenko.
Andriushchenko previously reported that a convoy of Russian military equipment was spotted passing through Mariupol heading towards the Rostov region. The vehicles were marked with symbols used to denote their Crimean origin. It has also been noted that Russian assault troops are unwaveringly advancing, with Ukrainian defenders remarking on what appears to be a lack of situational awareness among them, seemingly clueless as they march directly into fire traps.
Russia's losses have exceeded one million: the assault on eastern Ukraine continues
As Ukraine bleeds, Western opera welcomes back pro-Putin Russian singer Anna Netrebko
More than three years into Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine, many Western cultural institutions that had distanced themselves from Russian artists as a gesture of solidarity with Ukraine are now reversing course.
The U.K.’s Royal Ballet and Opera House announced on June 23 that its 2025-2026 cinema season, which is screened across 1,500 cinemas around the world, will kick off in early October with a performance of “Tosca” starring Russian soprano opera singer Anna Netrebko.
Once a leading figure in the opera world, Netrebko saw her performances canceled after 2022, following a history of remarks where she praised Russian President Vladimir Putin and defended Russian imperialism.
Though she issued a statement condemning the full-scale invasion that year, Netrebko has stopped short of ever directly criticizing Putin, who granted her Russia’s highest artistic honor — the title of People’s Artist — in 2008.Since the start of the full-scale invasion, many Ukrainians have argued that Russian culture can’t be separated from the country’s history of imperialism — a worldview they say is deeply embedded in its literature, music and art, and continues to fuel its aggression toward Ukraine and beyond.
What’s wrong with Netrebko
Following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the Metropolitan Opera in New York canceled a series of scheduled performances by Netrebko, reportedly expecting her to publicly denounce Putin.
In response, Netrebko filed a lawsuit in 2023 seeking at least $360,000 in damages and accusing the Met of defamation and breach of contract.
While she spoke out against the full-scale war in a statement from May 2022, Netrebko also declared “I love my homeland of Russia and only seek peace and unity through my art.”
Netrebko has repeatedly expressed views and took actions prior to 2022 that signaled admiration — even support — for the Russian authoritarian regime.Russian President Vladimir Putin, conductor Valery Gergiev, and singer Anna Netrebko attend the opening of the new Mariinsky II Theatre in St. Petersburg, Russia, on May 2, 2013. (Sasha Mordovets / Getty Images) “I think she is always doing what benefits her career. Until 2022, being Putin’s ‘court soprano’ and a protege of conductor Valery Gergiev — another pillar of the Kremlin’s influence in the world, who was sanctioned by the government of Canada just few days ago — was very good for her,” Ukrainian classical pianist Pavlo Gintov, who lives and performs in the West, told the Kyiv Independent.
“Since 2022, Netrebko has been trying to balance two worlds: continuing her performances in the West while avoiding an open break with Putin’s regime. And, as you can see, so far she has been quite successful.”
After Russia’s invasion of Georgia, Netrebko told Russian state media in 2009, “I am always unambiguously for Russia,” dismissing international coverage of the war as “extremely negative” attacks on her country.
While Western cultural institutions rekindle ties with Russian artists, Ukrainian artists continue to be killed.
In a Newsweek profile from 2011, Netrebko laughed off rumors from the Russian tabloids claiming she had been Putin’s lover, adding “I’d love to have been” and that “he’s a very attractive man” with “strong, male energy.”
In 2014, Netrebko made a donation of one million rubles to an opera house in Russian-occupied Donetsk, claiming it was an act of solidarity for her fellow artists suffering from the war and that there was nothing political about it.
However, she was photographed alongside Oleg Tsaryov, a pro-Russian Ukrainian politician, at the event in St. Petersburg where she made the donation. Both were seen holding the flag of the Russian occupation forces in Donetsk.
Putin praised Netrebko's "life-affirming spirit" and "clear civic stance" in a public tribute marking her 50th birthday in 2021 that was published on the Kremlin's website.
“Only a photo with the bandits and their Moscow handlers could be a better illustration of the global disgrace of the Royal Opera House,” wrote Ukrainian Foreign Minister Sergiy Kyslytsya on June 24 on X, formerly known as Twitter, referencing the notorious photo in response to the Royal Opera House’s lineup announcement.
Azerbaijani opera singer Yusif Eyvazov and Russian opera singer Anna Netrebko, perform on stage at the Thurn & Taxis Castle Festival in Regensburg, Germany, on July 23, 2022. (Isa Foltin / Getty Images) People protest against opera singer Anna Netrebko's appearance at the Schlossfestspiele in Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany, on July 22, 2022. (Ute Wessels / Picture Alliance via Getty Images) Larger trend
Netrebko’s return to Western opera marks a tentative shift in the West’s cultural landscape, as institutions begin to welcome Russian artists back more than three years after their country’s full-scale war against Ukraine cast a long shadow over their global standing.
Among these cultural figures are those who support Putin outright, those who oppose the war, or those who are deliberately trying to blur the line between the two.
As Western institutions move toward reintegrating Russian cultural figures into their cultural programs, Moscow has intensified its military campaign against Ukraine, launching record numbers of drones and missiles with increasing frequency, causing greater casualties.
This thaw raises ethical questions about complicity and accountability, such as when Russian actor Yura Borisov’s 2024 Oscar nomination for best supporting actor in the film “Anora.”Previously, Borisov starred in a Russian propaganda biopic about Mikhail Kalashnikov, the inventor of the AK-47, which was filmed in Russian-occupied Crimea and released in 2020.
Though Borisov’s name appeared on a 2022 statement by a Russian film actors’ union opposing the full-scale war, he didn’t mention it once during his major press tour for “Anora.”(L-R) Russian actor Yura Borisov, Mikey Madison, and Mark Eydelshteyn speak onstage during the 31st Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards at Shrine Auditorium and Expo Hall in Los Angeles, California, U.S. on Feb. 23, 2025. (Matt Winkelmeyer / Getty Images) Russian journalist Anastasia Trofimova also stirred outrage for her documentary “Russians at War,” which she claimed was meant to “humanize” Russian soldiers fighting in Ukraine “beyond the fog of war.”
Ukrainians and their supporters sought to have the film removed from several international film festivals due to Trofimova’s previous involvement with Russian state media and the documentary’s attempt to dissociate Russian soldiers from war crimes committed in Ukraine. Despite these efforts, a number of screenings have taken place.
The film was screened at three festivals in Canada, and although it was pulled from a number of other international festivals over protests, it remained in competition at the Athens International Film Festival in 2024.At the 2025 Photo London Festival, Russian fashion designer and photographer Gosha Rubchinsky presented his new photo book, “Victory Day,” which romanticizes Soviet army imagery that has been used to rally support amid Russians for the war against Ukraine.
While Western cultural institutions rekindle ties with Russian artists, Ukrainian artists continue to be killed — whether in Russia’s daily strikes on cities or while serving on the front line — underscoring the war’s unrelenting toll on Ukraine’s cultural life.For many Ukrainians, the inclusion of Russian cultural figures in the West is extremely painful, Gintov said — an oversight that ignores the painful reality of a nation still fighting for its survival.
“All this is happening while Russian artists like Netrebko — who openly and vocally supported Putin’s policies for many years, including his invasion of Ukraine in 2014 — are gaining applause in Berlin and in London. Something is fundamentally wrong about it.”Note from the author:
Hi there, it's Kate Tsurkan, thanks for reading my latest article. On the same day I wrote this article, I also wrote another about my friend Victoria Amelina, a Ukrainian author who was killed by Russia, posthumously winning a prestigious literary award. It's bitter and surreal to see the world begin to move on from caring about the ways Russian culture and Russian aggression are connected. Of course, this is not to say that every Russian artist is supportive of the war — but in Netrebko's case, there's a lot of past statements that raise troubling questions. If you like reading this sort of thing, please consider supporting us and becoming a member of the Kyiv Independent today.
‘Everyone says culture has nothing to do with it. It does’ — Ukrainian writer Volodymyr Rafeyenko on Russia’s warUkrainian author Volodymyr Rafeyenko never thought he would write a novel in Ukrainian. He was a native of Donetsk, an eastern Ukrainian city where he grew up speaking Russian and completed a degree in Russian philology. Early on in his career, he was the winner of some of Russia’sThe Kyiv IndependentLiliane Bivings
65th Brigade Sees Command Change
Colonel Volodymyr Izbash, commander of the 65th Mechanized Brigade of the Ukrainian Ground Forces, has announced his departure from the position via the unit’s official social media channels. Having taken…
Norway allocates €550 million for Ukraine's drone procurement
Norway has announced that it had allocated NOK 6.5 billion—more than €550 million—for the purchase of drones and related technologies from both Ukrainian and European producers, as confirmed by the Norwegian government.
Drones play a crucial role in Ukraine’s defense efforts, serving in the protection of critical infrastructure and frontline operations. Norway’s contribution is set to significantly bolster Ukraine’s capabilities in drone surveillance and operations. "This funding will aid Ukraine's capacity for necessary surveillance and operations using drones," stated Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre.
Norway, which joined the Drone Coalition in April, reaffirmed its commitment to enhancing support for Ukraine's defense industry. This development aligns with a March decision made by the Storting (Norwegian Parliament) to increase support for Ukraine through 2025 by NOK 50 billion. The financing not only aims to improve Ukraine's defense systems but also emphasizes the development of independent deterrent capabilities, which Minister of Defense Tore Onshus Sandvik described as vital post-peace agreement.
Sandvik affirmed Norway’s continued focus on delivering maritime security support, air defense, drones, and autonomous systems. Moreover, there is a priority on supporting defense equipment purchases from Ukrainian manufacturers and the Northern-Baltic cooperation in equipping and training new units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
Denmark has committed €1.26 billion this year to assist in the production of long-range drones in Ukraine. Significantly, Denmark will also become the first nation to establish a joint production facility for long-range drones and missiles outside Ukraine
Putin to skip BRICS summit in Brazil due to ICC arrest warrant
Russian President Vladimir Putin has decided not to attend the upcoming BRICS summit in Brazil due to an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC), Russian president’s foreign policy aide Yuriy Ushakov said on June 25.
“This is related to certain difficulties in the context of the ICC’s demands, as you know, and precisely in this context, the Brazilian government was unable to take a clear position that would allow our president to participate in this meeting,” Ushakov said.
Brazil is a member of the ICC and a signatory to the Rome Statute, meaning it is obliged to arrest Putin if he enters the country.
The BRICS summit, which is scheduled to take place on July 6–7, will be attended by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, according to Ushakov. Putin is expected to participate remotely via video.
BRICS, composed of Russia, China, India, Brazil, and other nations, is a group of emerging economies often portrayed as a counterweight to the Western-led world.
The ICC issued a warrant for the Russian leader’s arrest in March 2023 over the illegal deportation of Ukrainian children during Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
In November 2024, Putin skipped the G20 summit in Brazil and sent Lavrov instead.
Earlier in June, Moscow said that Putin had received an official invitation to attend the G20 summit in South Africa, another ICC member state. The event is scheduled to take place in Johannesburg from Nov. 22 to 23.
In September 2024, Putin made a rare visit to Mongolia, which is also a signatory of the ICC, prompting criticism over the non-enforcement of the warrant.
‘It’s possible’ — Trump on Putin’s territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine“I consider him (Russian President Vladimir Putin) a person I think is misguided,” U.S. President Donald Trump said speaking at a NATO press conference in The Hague on June 25.The Kyiv IndependentKateryna Denisova
Trump signals support for sending more Patriot missiles to Ukraine
Washington will “see” whether it can supply Kyiv with additional missiles for its Patriot air defense systems, U.S. President Donald Trump said during the NATO summit in The Hague on June 25 as Russia escalates its air strikes against Ukraine.
“They (Ukraine) do want to have the anti missiles, as they call them, the Patriots, and we’re going to see if we can make some available,” Trump said.
“They are very hard to get. We need them too. We are supplying them for Israel, and they are very effective."
After the meeting with Trump earlier in the day, Zelensky said that the two discussed the purchase of American air defense systems to shield Ukrainian cities and critical infrastructure.
In recent weeks, Moscow has intensified its drones and missiles strikes. As NATO leaders gathered for the summit, Russia launched an attack on the city of Dnipro, killing at least 19 people and injuring more than 300 others.
“Ukraine is ready to buy this equipment and support American weapons manufacturers. Europe can help. We also discussed the potential for co-production of drones. We can strengthen each other,” Zelensky added.
Previously, despite Kyiv’s appeals, Trump has dismissed the request, accusing Ukraine’s president of “always looking to purchase missiles” and falsely blaming Ukraine for provoking the war.
The Patriot is a high-precision, U.S.-made surface-to-air missile platform capable of intercepting aircraft, cruise missiles, and ballistic threats. Zelensky has repeatedly said Ukraine needs at least seven more systems to defend its most at-risk regions.
In early June, he confirmed that Trump’s administration diverted 20,000 anti-drone missiles originally intended for Ukraine to American forces in the Middle East.
Since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, Moscow has launched 28,743 Shahed-type drones at Ukraine — with 2,736, or roughly 9.5%, fired in June 2025 alone, Zelensky said.
‘It’s possible’ — Trump on Putin’s territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine“I consider him (Russian President Vladimir Putin) a person I think is misguided,” U.S. President Donald Trump said speaking at a NATO press conference in The Hague on June 25.The Kyiv IndependentKateryna Denisova
Russian military court convicts 184 Ukrainian servicemen involved in Kursk operation
Judges from Russia's 2nd Western District Military Court delivered verdicts for 184 Ukrainian servicemen captured during the Ukrainian Armed Forces' (AFU) incursion into the Kursk region, reports Mediazona.
The cases against those captured in Kursk stand apart from other terrorism-related cases in Russian courts due to a unified charge levied against all defendants – "committing a terrorist act by a group resulting in severe consequences." Since November 2024, a total of 159 cases involving 267 individuals have been brought to this court, the outlet specifies, though the sentences remain undisclosed.
As an example, Mediazona cites the case of AFU Junior Lieutenant Yevhen Goch, found guilty of terrorism by the Russian military court. The charge stems from his actions on October 8, 2024, when he allegedly entered Kursk, positioned himself near Olgovka, and spent three weeks hindering civilian evacuations and intimidating them through weapon display and use. Goch surrendered after being injured on October 27.
The Ukrainian Armed Forces launched an extensive military operation in Kursk on August 6, 2024, marking the first offensive of its kind since Russia's aggressive war against Ukraine began in February 2022. For an in-depth look, click here. By the third day of the Ukrainian operation, counter-terrorism measures were enforced in Belgorod, Bryansk, and Kursk. Then-governor Alexei Smirnov announced on August 12 that over 120,000 people had been evacuated, acknowledging AFU control over 28 localities in the area.
Russia’s Ministry of Defense announced the region's liberation at the end of April 2025, prompting a response from Ukraine’s General Staff that claimed the defensive operation in specific Kursk territories continues. More details here. TASS reported at the time that Russian forces captured over 500 Ukrainian soldiers in Kursk.
Russian forces capture two villages in Donetsk region
Russian forces have captured two villages in Ukraine's Donetsk region, according to DeepState. The Russian troops have also advanced near three other locations in Eastern Ukraine. Russian forces captured the villages of Konstaninopil and Andriivka in the Novopavlivka direction and pushed into the village of Shevchenko, as well as near Dneproenergiya and Aleksiivka, reports DeepState.
Meanwhile, the Ukrainian operational-tactical group Khortytsia indicated that the Russian army conducted assault operations near Zaporizhzhia, Mirne, Razliv, and Veselein the Novopavlivka direction. According to Khortytsia, Ukrainian military aims to destroy Russian manpower to slow their advances. Ukrainian forces are reportedly taking necessary actions to prevent any further deterioration of the tactical situation in the region.
Earlier, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky refuted reports of Russian troops advancing into the Dnipropetrovsk region. However, journalist and soldier of the 13th brigade of the National Guard, Yuriy Butusov, noted that the Russian forces are within 600 meters of the administrative border with Dnipropetrovsk. Ukrainian military officer Stanislav Bunyatov highlighted that due to lower population density in Dnipropetrovsk compared to Donetsk, Russian forces could advance more rapidly in this region.
Ukrainian drones strike key Russian defense plant in Taganrog
Ukrainian drones have reportedly targeted the "Atlant AERO" plant in Taganrog, a facility known for its production of aerial and space equipment. The "Atlant AERO" plant is engaged in manufacturing aviation and space equipment. Moreover, local authorities report drone activity near the city's stadium. In the early hours of June 25, "friendly" drones visited the Atlant AERO plant in Taganrog.
Following the drone sightings, a fire broke out on the factory premises, as reported by locals who shared footage online. Rostov Region Governor Yuri Slyusar confirmed the drone attack during the night. According to him, the Russian air defense system intercepted "all" drones over Taganrog, Azov, and Rodionovo-Nesvetaysk. Slyusar also noted drone activity at the "Forte Arena" stadium but omitted mentioning the plant itself. Andrey Kovalenko, head of the Disinformation Counteraction Center, highlighted the plant's significance in Russia's military-industrial complex. He revealed that the facility manufactures components for "Orion" drones, electronic warfare systems, loitering munitions, and FPV drones. Exactly one year ago, this plant in Taganrog was similarly targeted by drones. The Russian Ministry of Defense reported intercepting 22 drones that targeted Crimea, Bryansk, Belgorod, Saratov, and Ulyanovsk regions.
'It's possible' — Trump on Putin's territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine
Speaking at a NATO press conference in The Hague on June 25, U.S. President Donald Trump said it was possible Russia could target other countries beside Ukraine.
When asked whether Russian President Vladimir Putin has territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine, Trump replied, “it’s possible."
“I know one thing: He (Putin) would like to settle (the war). He’d like to get out of this thing. It’s a mess for him,” he added.
Foreign officials and EU diplomats have increasingly called for the preparation for a potential full-scale conflict between NATO and Russia.
Trump’s remarks came days after President Volodymyr Zelensky said that Ukraine’s intelligence has proof that Russia is preparing new military operations in Europe and just a week after Putin declared “all of Ukraine is ours."
During The Hague summit, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called on alliance members to be realistic about the threats posed by Russia and China.
While Trump appeared to downplay concerns about Putin’s threat, he later said that the Russian leader “really has to end that war” against Ukraine. During his speech, he also referred to Russia’s all-out war as a “crisis,” a term used by some Russian allies but criticized by Kyiv.
“I consider him (Putin) a person I think is misguided,” Trump said.
The U.S. leader said his June 25 meeting with Zelensky, which preceded the briefing, “couldn’t have been nicer."
“I think it’s a great time to end it (war). I’m going to speak to Vladimir Putin, see if we can get it ended,” Trump said. “He (Zelensky) is fighting a brave battle, it’s a tough battle."
Separately, Trump acknowledged that Ukraine wants to receive Patriot missiles, saying that the U.S. is going to see “if we can make some available."
In recent weeks, Russia has intensified drone and missile attacks on Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities, killing and injuring hundreds of civilians.
Despite Kyiv’s appeals, Trump has dismissed the request, accusing Zelensky of “always looking to purchase missiles” and falsely blaming Ukraine for provoking the war.
NATO allies set new 5% defense spending target, reaffirm support for Ukraine, but fail to condemn RussiaThe leaders also reaffirmed support for Ukraine, stating that direct contributions to Ukraine’s defense and industrial capacity will be counted toward the 5% total.The Kyiv IndependentAnna Fratsyvir
Why Russian economy warnings might be the only thing out of Moscow you can actually believe
In a rare public sign that all is not well in Russia, two high-ranking Moscow officials last week issued separate warnings about the state of the country’s economy.
Russian Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina and Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov both highlighted that amid the Kremlin’s full-scale war against Ukraine, the tools Moscow once relied on to maintain wartime growth are nearly exhausted.
Almost immediately, Russian President Vladimir Putin on June 20 dismissed the concerns, claiming that Russia’s economy remained strong despite sanctions and war.
But experts say the Kremlin’s internal messaging diverges sharply from the emerging reality. And in a country known for official lines that diverge wildy from truth and reality, Nabiullina and Reshetnikov’s warnings are likely accurate.
“These Russian officials realize their responsibility for the failure of this entire policy,” Vladimir Milov, a Russian opposition politician who was an economic advisor for the Russian government in the early 2000s, told the Kyiv Independent.
“They understand that they will have to face the consequences and cannot ignore reality — the moment had to come when they would openly talk about it. So they did."
Russia’s Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina attends the Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum in Saint Petersburg, Russia, on June 19, 2025. (Olga Maltseva / AFP via Getty Images) The Russian economic warnings
Nabiullina said on June 20 that the momentum behind Russia’s wartime economic expansion is rapidly fading.
She pointed to the depletion of key internal resources that had underpinned growth since 2022 — including labor, industrial capacity, bank capital reserves, and liquid assets from the National Wealth Fund (NWF).
Reshetnikov a day earlier echoed the warning, saying the Russian economy is “on the verge of a transition to recession,” and that the next phase would be decisive.
Despite Putin’s insistence that all is well, the dual warnings come as cracks in Russia’s so-called economic resilience are becoming more visible, and years of high military spending, sanctions, and trade isolation take their toll.
Speaking out — but only when the Kremlin allows it
An authoritarian system like Russia’s allows a certain degree of rhetorical leeway for senior technocrats, but it’s strictly limited to the economic sphere, exiled Russian political scientist Ekaterina Schulmann told the Kyiv Independent.
“Our autocracy relies on the expertise of capable managers, particularly those concentrated in the financial and economic bloc of the government,” Schulmann said.
“In order for them to function, they are given a certain degree of autonomy… and this package of what they are allowed to do includes a certain degree of rhetorical freedom when speaking on their allotted subjects."
National Wealth Fund depleted as economic illusion fades
One of the clearest signs of economic stress is the sharp depletion of Russia’s National Wealth Fund.
Once a vital cushion for government spending, the NWF’s liquid assets have plummeted from 8.43 trillion rubles ($107 billion) in January 2022 to just 2.8 trillion rubles ($35.5 billion) in May, according to the Russian Finance Ministry.
Milov said the illusion of post-2022 economic stability was built on a single factor — massive state spending fueled by reserves accumulated prior to the invasion.
“All of Russia’s so-called economic miracle after the full-scale invasion and sanctions came down to a single factor — the government burned through its accumulated financial reserves to prop up the economy,” Milov told the Kyiv Independent.
Those resources are running out. Russia is depleting its financial reserves to offset a growing budget deficit driven by soaring government expenditures and falling revenues.
“Investments are not coming to Russia; everything is developing only at the expense of budget funds, and budget funds are being reduced.”
Since the war began, the structure of the NWF has also shifted.
Once held largely in freely convertible currencies, the fund now consists mostly of less liquid assets such as Chinese yuan and gold, further limiting Moscow's flexibility.
Milov also said that Russian leaders' earlier promises to develop domestic industry and reduce dependency on imports have failed to materialize.
According to Milov, only sectors receiving direct government support are showing growth, and that support is increasingly under strain.
"There had to come a moment when these resources would become so scarce that everyone would start talking about it very seriously," Milov said.
"Investments are not coming to Russia; everything is developing only at the expense of budget funds, and budget funds are being reduced."
Militarization risks stagnation
Another issue with Russia's economy is its militarization.
Russian military spending has increased to 6% of GDP in 2025, its highest level since the Cold War, while the federal budget deficit continues to grow.
Economist Andrei Movchan, founder of Movchan's Group, says it is undermining overall performance by diverting labor and capital away from the civilian sector.
"At first, such a shift leads to a sharp increase in military production, which boosts overall economic indicators despite the downturn in the civilian sector," Movchan said.
"But once the military-industrial complex hits a plateau, and it's impossible to expand it endlessly, even for military needs, the economy is left without a main growth engine."
Russian President Vladimir Putin visits Uralvagonzavod, the country’s main tank factory in the Urals, in Nizhny Tagil, Russia, on Feb. 15, 2024. (Ramil Sitdikov / Pool / AFP via Getty Images) "Costs remain high across the board, civilian sector investment is constrained, and the country inevitably drifts toward stagnation or even recession."
Still, Movchan warned that the civilian downturn alone will not necessarily trigger a full-blown collapse, as long as global energy prices remain elevated.
Russia continues to depend heavily on hydrocarbon exports to finance its war.
"Yes, the two-to-threefold increase in military spending — or even fourfold, according to some estimates — will have to be paid for with a recession in the civilian sector and overall stagnation. But that's not a disaster," he said.
Rising oil prices may not save Russia's war economy
Oil revenues remain a vital part of Russia's economy.
On June 13, prices surged after Israeli air strikes targeted Iranian nuclear sites, sparking fears of a wider regional conflict and disruptions to shipping routes.
President Volodymyr Zelensky warned that high oil prices could embolden the Kremlin, which has long relied on oil windfalls to fund its military campaign.
But Milov said even rising oil prices may no longer be enough to shield Russia's finances.
"The initial version of this year's federal budget, which has already been amended, assumed that it would still be heavily in deficit even at a price of $70 per barrel," he said.
"It depends greatly on how the situation develops further... But we see that the global oil market is digesting this war paradigm. There is no sharp increase to $100 per barrel or anything like that."
"If things deteriorate so quickly that signs of dysfunction become visible — signs that the system is no longer coping — that becomes a dangerous signal for the regime's stability."
"Based on the current scenario, at this moment, we can say that this does not represent any kind of salvation for Putin."
The oil tanker Eagle S is anchored near Kilpilahti port in Porvoo, Gulf of Finland, on Jan. 13, 2025. (Vesa Moilanen / Lehtikuva / AFP) Unpaid wages, empty shelves may shake Putin's image of control
As economic difficulties deepen, the crucial issue becomes how much they will erode the regime's hold on power.
Schulmann said in autocratic systems, both citizens and elites tend to judge power not by its legitimacy, effectiveness, or even benefits to themselves, but by one key question — whether it is strong or weak.
"A sharp economic downturn, a sudden deterioration in living standards, seen in things like unpaid wages and pensions, shortages of essential goods… will be interpreted as a sign of weakness from those in power," she said.
"On the other hand, a gradual deterioration rather engages the people in an ongoing individualistic survival game, leaving them no time to even ask themselves whose fault it is."
Schulmann noted that rising prices alone do not typically trigger mass discontent. But if dysfunction becomes visible, when shelves are empty, utilities fail, or salaries go unpaid, that sends a clear signal to citizens and elites alike — the system is no longer coping.
"If things deteriorate so quickly that signs of dysfunction become visible — signs that the system is no longer coping — that becomes a dangerous signal for the regime's stability," she said.
Note from the author:
Hi, this is Tim. Thank you for reading this article. The Kyiv Independent doesn't have a wealthy owner or a paywall. Instead, we rely on readers like you to keep our journalism funded. If you liked this article, consider joining our community today.
Investigation: How Russia prepares its strategic missile plant for ‘eternal war’Key findings: * Despite international sanctions, Russia’s strategic missile plant was able to import complex machinery to dramatically increase missile production. * The Kyiv Independent has identified the equipment supplied to the plant, as well as the supply chains, mostly from China. * We located the plant’s new premises, built to house theThe Kyiv IndependentAlisa Yurchenko
For Putin, war is existential — Estonian foreign minister at NATO summit
The Kyiv Independent’s Martin Fornusek sits down with Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna on the sidelines of the NATO summit, held in The Hague on June 24-25, to discuss the changes in the U.S. rhetoric about Ukraine’s membership in NATO. They also speak about U.S. President Donald Trump’s commitment to the Alliance, how the Israel-Iran escalation affects NATO’s focus on Ukraine, and why Europe must take more responsibility for its own defense.